THE CITY OF KENT, OHIO
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
WED., MAR. 17, 2010
7:15 P.M. BOARD OF CONTROL
7:20 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING
- Amendment to Brimfield-Kent JEDD
7:30 P.M. REGULAR COUNCIL
1.0 ROLL CALL
2.0 OPENING REMARKS/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (MR. FERRARA)
3.0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
3.1 Minutes of Regular Council meeting of Feb. 17, 2010
4.0 COMMUNICATIONS
4.1 Audience (All members of the audience wishing to address Council should sign up with the Clerk of Council prior to speaking)
4.2 Written
4.2.1 An email was received from Laurel Hurst on Feb. 18, 2010 with her thoughts on the budget passed the previous day. Council members Ferrara and Shaffer responded to that email, and Ms. Hurst responded to them. All emails were forwarded to Council and the Mayor as they were received.
4.2.2 The 2009 Annual report for the Police Department was placed on file in Council=s office on Feb. 24, 2010. This report was also made available on the City=s website on Feb. 25, 2010.
4.2.3 A carbon copy of a letter was received on March 3, 2010 from Fred Davis of Vine Street addressing his concern regarding the pavement on his street that was executed in 2009. This letter was forwarded to Council and the Mayor on the same day.
4.2.4 The agenda packet from the Feb. 25, 2010 Parks & Recreation Board meeting was placed on file by Council=s liaison, Wayne Wilson, on March 3, 2010.
4.2.5 A carbon copy of an email was received from Jim Sumner on March 8, 2010 with his concerns regarding the park located in River Bend subdivision. This email was sent to the Parks & Recreation Director. It was forwarded to the Mayor and Council on the same day, with Mr. Idone=s response. Mr. Sumner sent an additional email on March 9, 2010, which was also forwarded to all members of Council and the Mayor on the same day. Council member Ferrara responded to Mr. Sumner, and his email was carbon-copied to all members of Council on March 9, 2010.
4.2.6 An email was received on March 8, 2010 from Gregg Vilk expressing his concerns with the City=s enforcement and inspection of 225 S. Water Street. This email was forwarded to Council members on the same day.
4.3 City Manager=s Report
5.0 STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS
5.1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (VALENTA/TURNER)
5.1.1 Written report of March 3, 2010.
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
1. TO AUTHORIZE THE LEASE WITH SCOTT ARRINGTON, FOR THE SUMMIT STREET INCUBATOR, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE.
2. TO AUTHORIZE THE CDBG PROGRAM, FY2010, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE.
5.1.2 DRAFT NO. 10-13: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2005-34, PASSED APRIL 20, 2005; AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2007-15, PASSED FEBRUARY 7, 2007, SO AS TO AMEND THE BRIMFIELD-KENT JOINT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CONTRACT TO AMEND THE TAX RATE BEGINNING ON JAN. 1, 2011 AND FOR SUBSEQUENT YEARS. (AUTHORIZED)
5.1.3 DRAFT NO. 10-29: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO ENTER INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SCOTT J. ARRINGTON dba THE BUZZ, LLC FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 203 EAST SUMMIT STREET, KENT, OHIO AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (AUTHORIZED)
5.2 FINANCE COMMITTEE (WILSON/FERRARA)
5.2.1 Written report of Feb. 17, 2010 (Oral reports/actions approved Feb. 17, 2010)
5.2.2 DRAFT NO. 10-25: AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A DONATION RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF KENT PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $485.15 FROM THE FUNDRAISERS HELD FOR THE KENT SKATE PARK, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (UNAUTHORIZED)
5.2.3 DRAFT NO. 10-26: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PURCHASE BY THE KENT DOWNTOWN URBAN REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (DKC) OF APPROXIMATELY .3003 ACRES OF PROPERTY (3 PARCELS) LOCATED AT 241 SOUTH WATER STREET AND THE VACANT LOT BEHIND IT, IN THE CITY OF KENT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 3.2 AND 3.3 OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OPERATING AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 17, 2009, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (AUTHORIZED)
5.2.4 DRAFT NO. 10-28: AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO APPLY FOR A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 1,250,0000 OR HIGHER FROM THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (UNAUTHORIZED)
5.3 HEALTH & SAFETY COMMITTEE (KUHAR/AMRHEIN)
5.3.1 Written report of March 3, 2010
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
1. UPDATE OF REGIONAL FIRE STUDY PRESENTED; NO ACTION NEEDED.
5.4 LAND USE COMMITTEE (FERRARA/SHAFFER)
5.5 STREETS, SIDEWALKS & UTILITIES COMMITTEE
(DELEONE/WALLACH)
5.5.1 Written report of March 3, 2010
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
1. AREA Q STORM WATER PROJECT DISCUSSION WAS DEFERRED
2. REPORTS WERE RECEIVED, FOR 2009, FOR THE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY AND THE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN.
5.5.2 DRAFT NO. 10-27: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO PARTICIPATE IN THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION=S CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF SODIUM CHLORIDE/ROCK SALT FOR THE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (Unauthorized)
6.0 SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS
7.0 UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8.0 NEW BUSINESS
8.1 Items needing Council action or referral
8.2 Schedule future Council meetings
8.3 Council members comments
9.0 MAYOR=S REPORT
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
Posted: March 11, 2010 Linda M. Copley, MMC RP
Clerk, Kent City Council
THE CITY OF KENT, OHIO
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
WED., FEB. 17, 2010
This regular meeting of Kent City Council was called to order on Wed., Feb. 17, 2010 at 7:30 p.m. by Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council.
PRESENT: MR. AMRHEIN, MR. DELEONE, MR. FERRARA, MR. KUHAR, MS. SHAFFER, MR. VALENTA, MS. WALLACH, AND MR. WILSON
ALSO PRESENT: J. FIALA, MAYOR & PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL; D. RULLER, CITY MANAGER; J. SILVER, LAW DIRECTOR. AND L. COPLEY, CLERK OF COUNCIL
ABSENT: MR. TURNER
MOTION TO EXCUSE MR. TURNER.
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by Ms. Shaffer, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
Mayor Fiala called upon Mr. DeLeone for his opening remarks at this time.
Mr. DeLeone said the City received good news earlier in the day, but he was not going to steal the City Manager=s thunder. He thanked all who were involved with the grant received.
Following his opening remarks, Mr. DeLeone led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance.
MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS OF DEC. 16, 2009 AND JAN. 20, 2010; SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF FEB. 3, 2010; AND TWO (2) PUBLIC HEARINGS OF FEB. 3, 2010.
Motion made by Mr. DeLeone, seconded by Mr. Wilson, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
Mayor Fiala called for audience comment at this time. He reminded those wishing to address Council to sign up with the Clerk of Council who would call them forward.
Aubrey & Rachel: Rachel explained that the US Census funds would be sent to households in April, and was the shortest form ever with only ten questions. Aubrey explained that the census information determines $400 billion in government funding annually. She said it generates thousands of jobs, and impacts voices in Congress.
Aubrey explained they are from Kent State University, and are involved in a national competition. She said their client is the 2010 Census. She said their goal was to create awareness throughout the community. Rachel said Kent has been identified as a Ahard to count@ area, and those are defined as areas that have a lack of awareness and motivation, consisting of those who are uninformed or misinformed.
Aubrey said with the help of the City Manager and the Mayor, next week will be ACensus Awareness Week,@ and asked for their help to educate the community. She said their contact information was on the table in the hallway. She said they wanted to make sure Kent is not part of the Ahard to count area.@
Beth and Sadie Oswitch: Ms. Oswitch explained her daughter is in the fifth grade at Walls Elementary. She said her class had to do a persuasive letter, and her daughter wrote one to the Mayor. She said that Sadie=s teacher felt she should read it to Mayor Fiala.
Sadie read her letter at this time. In her letter she asked for more businesses downtown with the types of stores teenagers and the elderly like.
Hearing no further audience comment, Mayor Fiala called upon the Clerk for the written correspondence.
The Clerk reported that proposed amendments to the Charter were hand-delivered to the Council office by David Kessler and were distributed to members of Council earlier in the evening.
The Clerk reported that the minutes of the January meeting of the Standing Rock Cemetery Board were placed on file by Council=s representative, Mr. DeLeone, earlier in the evening.
City Manager=s Report
MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS #1 THRU #8
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by Mr. DeLeone, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE APPROVED BY THE AFOREMENTIONED MOTION:
1. Authorization of Draft No. 10-24, donation to Kent Fire Department
2. Authorization of Draft No. 10-17, renewal of the Kent-Sugar Bush Knolls fire service contract
3. Authorization of Draft No. 10-18, AMATS grant application for downtown multi-modal facility (Clerk’s note: This draft ordinance was removed from the agenda after the award of $20 million for the facility)
4. Authorization of Draft No. 10-21, 2010 budget
5. Health & Safety Committee time, update on regional fire services study
6. Community Development Committee to discuss a potential new tenant for Summit Street Incubator
7. Streets, Sidewalks, and Utilities Committee, to discuss Phase V of the Area Q Storm water Drainage project
8. Community Development time, to discuss CDBG program
Mr. Ruller said he wished to follow up on Mr. DeLeone’s comments. He said the media was present from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. He said earlier in the day, the City received a call from Congressman Ryan, who is a great advocate for Kent. He said they had previously put in a request for federal stimulus dollars for the multi-modal facility, which will be the launching pad for everything they aspire to do downtown. He said it has a place for parking, pedestrians, buses, and bikes.
Mr. Ruller said they felt they had a great plan, but there was stiff competition. He said the Congressman dragged it out, telling them how fierce the competition was, adding he felt like he was on American Idol.
Mr. Ruller said they received $20 million for the multi-modal facility, which was beyond words. He said this makes it possible to do almost everything they ever hoped for in the planning project. He said they owe Congressman Ryan an enormous debt. He said they should send some thank you notes. He said when he told Dan Smith about the grant, his response was “Game On.” He said Mr. Smith is right, adding they are ready to roll, and put it together.
Mr. Ruller said it was a great day in Kent, despite the snow and the clouds. He said it was very warm inside. Mr. Ruller said they do not get a lot of opportunities to celebrate great news, adding that today was a great day.
Mayor Fiala noted there was only $50 million available. Mr. Ruller said the total requests from Ohio were about $500 million. He said the feds funded $50 million for Ohio, and Kent is receiving $20 million. Mr. Ruller said if they look at the population percentage they represent, they received more than was warranted by their population.
Mr. Ruller said he spoke with Sherrod Brown’s office, thanking them for their advocacy role. He said they told him that the project stood on its own merit and met all of the criteria. He said they are enjoying today, and will get busy tomorrow.
Mayor Fiala recessed this meeting at 7:41 p.m., for a previously scheduled Finance Committee meeting.
Mayor Fiala reconvened this meeting at 9:25 p.m.
STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
MOTION TO APPROVE THE WRITTEN REPORT OF JAN. 6, 2010 AND FEB. 3, 2010.
Motion made by Mr. Valenta, seconded by Mr. DeLeone, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
MOTION TO APPROVE THE ACTIONS OF THE FEB. 3, 2010 MEETING.
Motion made by Mr. Valenta, seconded by Mr. Ferrara, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
The following actions were approved by the aforementioned motion:
1. TO APPROVE THE MAIN STREET PROPOSAL FOR ADOPT-A-SPOT
2. TO AUTHORIZE THE DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PROJECT DECLARATION OF COLLECTIVE INTENT
3. TO AUTHORIZE THE KSU ESPLANADE-ERIE STREET EXTENSION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
The Mayor asked the Clerk to read Draft No. 10-22 by title only at this time.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUING THEIR JOINT EFFORTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ERIE STREET GENERALLY LOCATED FROM LINCOLN STREET TO WATER STREET, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
MOTION TO SUSPEND THE THREE READINGS.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. DeLeone.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, Ms. Shaffer, Mr. Valenta, Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, and Mr. Amrhein. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
MOTION TO ADOPT THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. DeLeone.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, Ms. Shaffer, Mr. Valenta, Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, and Mr. Amrhein. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
2010-17: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENT AND KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUING THEIR JOINT EFFORTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ERIE STREET GENERALLY LOCATED FROM LINCOLN STREET TO WATER STREET, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council
FINANCE COMMITTEE
MOTION TO APPROVE THE WRITTEN REPORT OF JAN. 6, 2010, WRITTEN REPORT OF FEB. 3, 2010; THE ORAL REPORT OF FEB. 17, 2010; AND THE RECOMMENDED ACTION OF FEB. 17, 2010, AUTHORIZING THE 2010 BUDGET.
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by DeLeone, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
The Mayor asked the Clerk to read Draft No. 10-21 by title only at this time.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2009-129 (2010 TEMPORARY APPROPRIATIONS), PASSED DECEMBER 2, 2009, SO AS TO APPROPRIATE FROM THE VARIOUS FUNDS OF THE CITY OF KENT TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS FOR THE CURRENT EXPENSES OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2010.
MOTION TO SUSPEND THE THREE READINGS.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. Wilson.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, Ms. Shaffer, Mr. Valenta, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, and Mr. DeLeone. Ms. Wallach dissented. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 7-1.
MOTION TO ADOPT THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by Mr. Ferrara.
Ms. Wallach said she was not voting for the emergency clause because she felt this was an important piece of legislation that should go through three readings so citizens could look it over. She said they were urged to pass it, and fix it later. Ms. Wallach said she would like to fix it first, and pass it later. Ms. Wallach said she would like to give the citizens a chance to look at the budget and see what it is about before Council passes it.
Mr. Kuhar said he is not voting for it either. He said they need to make government smaller in Kent on that end. He said on the other end, by the end of the year, they will have spent far more than what was represented by the budget. He said it is a snapshot that does not give a good picture of where they are going financially in 2010.
Mr. Valenta said he did look at the numbers. He said in 2010 they are budgeted to have $7,757,230 above the 2009 figure. He said it is a difference of about $5 million between last year and this year=s federal aid received. He said if they take that out of the expenditures they are going to have, they will end up with approximately $162,821 less than where they were in 2009 as compared to 2010. He said the $45 million in the expenses is the result of the additional $5 million they are getting in aid from the federal government. He said he felt there was some confusion. Mr. Valenta said if they do not spend it, someone else will spend it. He said it is important that they pass the budget.
Mr. Wilson asked the Clerk if they passed suspension, and she said it passed.
Mr. Wilson said this is a good clean budget. He said he has sat through it for nineteen years, adding that no one on the staff has a crystal ball to tell them what they are going to spend daily. He said they have to make assumptions, adding that they hopefully will eat less into the carryover funds. He said it will work out, as it does every year. He said they are conservative on the revenue side, and liberal on the expense side.
Mr. Wilson said that the staff has worked hard on putting together a clean budget. He said if they want to knock out $5 million to satisfy their feelings, they have to knock out some programs. He said the Council put the programs in, not the staff. He said they can tell them no more plowing or water transportation. He said the staff has done what they gave them to work with. He said it is a clean budget and they need to pass it.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. Ferrara, Ms. Shaffer, Mr. Valenta, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, and Mr. DeLeone. Mr. Kuhar and Ms. Wallach dissented. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 6-2.
2010-18: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2009-129 (2010 TEMPORARY APPROPRIATIONS), PASSED DECEMBER 2, 2009, SO AS TO APPROPRIATE FROM THE VARIOUS FUNDS OF THE CITY OF KENT TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS FOR THE CURRENT EXPENSES OF THE CITY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2010.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council
The Mayor asked the Clerk to read Draft No. 10-24 by title only at this time.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $200.00 TO THE CITY OF KENT FIRE DEPARTMENT FROM FRAN VASIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEDICAL AND FIRE EQUIPMENT, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
MOTION TO SUSPEND THE THREE READINGS.
Motion made by Mr. Kuhar, seconded by Mr. Ferrara.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Ms. Shaffer, Mr. Valenta, Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, and Mr. Kuhar. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
MOTION TO ADOPT THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by Mr. DeLeone.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Ms. Shaffer, Mr. Valenta, Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, and Mr. Kuhar. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
2010-19: AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $200.00 TO THE CITY OF KENT FIRE DEPARTMENT FROM FRAN VASIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEDICAL AND FIRE EQUIPMENT, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
HEALTH & SAFETY COMMITTEE
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council
HEALTH & SAFETY COMMITTEE
MOTION TO APPROVE THE WRITTEN REPORT OF JAN. 6, 2010.
Motion made by Mr. Kuhar, seconded by Mr. Wilson, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
The Mayor asked the Clerk to read Draft No. 10-17 by title only at this time.
AN ORDINANCE REPLACING ORDINANCE NO. 2004- 81, PASSED JUNE 9, 2004, ENTITLED AAN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A NEW FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE VILLAGE OF SUGAR BUSH KNOLLS, OHIO AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY@ FOR PURPOSES OF TEMPORARILY EXTENDING A CONTRACT FOR FIRE EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND RESCUE SERVICES BY THE CITY FOR THE VILLAGE FOR THE PERIOD OF JUNE 1, 2009 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
MOTION TO SUSPEND THE THREE READINGS.
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by Mr. Kuhar.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. Valenta, Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, and Ms. Shaffer. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
MOTION TO ADOPT THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by Mr. DeLeone.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. Valenta, Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, and Ms. Shaffer. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
2010-20: AN ORDINANCE REPLACING ORDINANCE NO. 2004- 81, PASSED JUNE 9, 2004, ENTITLED@ AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A NEW FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE VILLAGE OF SUGAR BUSH KNOLLS, OHIO AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY@ FOR PURPOSES OF TEMPORARILY EXTENDING A CONTRACT FOR FIRE EMERGENCY MEDICAL AND RESCUE SERVICES BY THE CITY FOR THE VILLAGE FOR THE PERIOD OF JUNE 1, 2009 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council
LAND USE COMMITTEE
MOTION TO APPROVE THE WRITTEN REPORT OF FEB. 3, 2010 AND THE RECOMMENDED ACTION, AUTHORIZING THE ZONING AMENDMENT TO '1171.01.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. Wilson, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
The Mayor asked the Clerk to read Draft No. 10-23 by title only at this time.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1171.01 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF KENT, ENTITLED “REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES,” SO AS TO REQUIRE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOLS AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN A COMMERCIAL BUILDING MEETING ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
MOTION TO SUSPEND THE THREE READINGS.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. DeLeone.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. Valenta, Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, and Ms. Shaffer. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
MOTION TO ADOPT THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by Mr. Valenta.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. Valenta, Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, and Ms. Shaffer. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
2010-21: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1171.01 OF THE CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF KENT, ENTITLED “REQUIREMENTS FOR CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES,” SO AS TO REQUIRE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE SCHOOLS AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN A COMMERCIAL BUILDING MEETING ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council
STREETS, SIDEWALKS & UTILITIES COMMITTEE
MOTION TO APPROVE THE WRITTEN REPORT OF FEB. 3, 2010 AND RECOMMENDED ACTION, APPROVING THE APPLICATION TO AMATS, WITH THE THREE PROJECTS PRESENTED, WITH THE INCLUSION OF THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE.
Motion made by Mr. DeLeone, seconded by Mr. Valenta, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
The Mayor asked the Clerk to read Draft No. 10-19 by title only at this time.
A RESOLUTION ALLOWING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPLY FOR FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (TEP) FUNDS, PROGRAMMED BY THE AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (AMATS) TO CONSTRUCT THE PORTAGE HIKE & BIKE TRAIL B KSU GATEWAY SEGMENT PROJECT, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
MOTION TO SUSPEND THE THREE READINGS.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. DeLeone.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, Ms. Shaffer, and Mr. Valenta. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
MOTION TO ADOPT THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.
Motion made by Mr. DeLeone, seconded by Mr. Ferrara.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Ms. Wallach, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, Ms. Shaffer, and Mr. Valenta. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
2010-22: A RESOLUTION ALLOWING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPLY FOR FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (TEP) FUNDS, PROGRAMMED BY THE AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (AMATS) TO CONSTRUCT THE PORTAGE HIKE & BIKE TRAIL B KSU GATEWAY SEGMENT PROJECT, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council
The Mayor asked the Clerk to read Draft No. 10-20 by title only at this time.
A RESOLUTION ALLOWING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPLY FOR FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM, (STP) FUNDS PROGRAMMED BY THE AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (AMATS) TO RESURFACE EAST SUMMIT STREET AND CRAIN AVENUE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
MOTION TO SUSPEND THE THREE READINGS.
Motion made by Mr. DeLeone, seconded by Mr. Ferrara.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, Ms. Shaffer, Mr. Valenta, and Ms. Wallach. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 8-0.
MOTION TO ADOPT THE DRAFT ORDINANCE.
Motion made by Mr. DeLeone, seconded by Mr. Wilson.
Roll call was taken on the motion. Voting aye: Mr. Wilson, Mr. Amrhein, Mr. DeLeone, Mr. Ferrara, Mr. Kuhar, Ms. Shaffer, Mr. Valenta, and Ms. Wallach. The motion carried by a roll call vote of 9-0.
2010-23: A RESOLUTION ALLOWING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE TO APPLY FOR FEDERAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM, (STP) FUNDS PROGRAMMED BY THE AKRON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY (AMATS) TO RESURFACE EAST SUMMIT STREET AND CRAIN AVENUE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council
SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS - None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS
MOTION TO REFER TO THE ADMINISTRATION THE POSSIBILITY OF SOME TYPE OF SIDEWALK CLEARING EQUIPMENT THAT CAN DO AN ADEQUATE JOB AT A REASONABLE COST.
Motion made by Mr. Kuhar, seconded by Ms. Wallach.
Mr. Kuhar said they will eventually have to do something about clearing the sidewalks. He said it may not be all of the sidewalks or all of the time. He said they will have money sooner or later. Mr. Kuhar said they can spend millions on hike and bike trails and bus garages, but their citizens have a hard time walking down the sidewalk.
Mr. DeLeone suggested they include the cost of someone running the equipment also. He said there is no one there now to do it.
Mr. Ferrara said they just voted Ano@ on a budget because of the spending. He questioned how many countless hours they spent the previous year on snow removal on the sidewalks. He said staff spent hundreds of hours, and Council allocated $50,000. He said they now want to explore the possibility of doing this all over again. He said he is voting against the motion, as it is ridiculous.
Mr. Wilson said Mr. Ferrara is exactly right that this is what they started out with last year. He said they got prices then, and they have not gone down since that time. Mr. Wilson said it is a waste of staff=s time, adding they have other things to do as opposed to rehashing this every six months.
Ms. Shaffer said it is a critical issue, but the budget does not sustain it at this time. She said they have to keep it in the back of their minds, as it is an important issue, particularly SR 43 and the bus stops. She said people have a different time clearing them themselves. Ms. Shaffer said they looked that the issue thoroughly, and felt it was not in the budget. She said she wants to revisit it, but not at this time.
The motion failed by a voice vote of 1-7, with Mr. Kuhar as the only person supporting the motion.
Mr. Wilson said he wanted to thank the Manager and all of the staff for the fantastic job they did getting the P.A.R.T.A. money. He said he is so pleased. He said he was happy all day, and even coming to this meeting. Mr. Wilson thanked all of the staff at this time.
Ms. Shaffer said she has been very happy, also, adding she was very high all day. Ms. Shaffer said that with respect to the budget and the ways to possibly enhance the revenues, it would be worth exploring how to lower the fuel costs and the cost of the utilities throughout the year. She said in the absence of the R.I.T.A. tapes, they need to look at some type of process to track contractors, either through Kent State or the ones hired by the City. She said they need to be sure they are getting the tax dollars from contractors working in Kent.
Ms. Wallach reminded them that the Chinese New Year began this past weekend, and it was the Year of the Tiger.
Mr. Valenta seconded Mr. Wilson=s comments, but said he would also like to thank their partners. He said he did not believe this project would have come to fruition without Dr. Lefton, Kent State University, and P.A.R.T.A. He said it is a true symbolism how they can all work together to make Kent better. He said this is a great outcome. He thanked Mr. Bowling and Ms. Susel. He said without their grant writing expertise, they may not be celebrating.
Mr. Amrhein echoed the previous comments. He said it is so nice to turn on the news and see Kent portrayed in a positive light. He spoke of how fortunate they are as cities are struggling to survive and Kent is expanding. He thanked everyone on the staff.
Mr. Ferrara said he hated to belabor it, but this was such a huge event. He said they have passed from saying AWhy doesn=t Kent have...@ or AWhy can=t we do...@. to the period of AWe are going to do this@ and AWe are able to do that@. He said that is a huge step. He said they are past the tipping point and into an opportunity of real growth and city building. He said it is a great thing, and staff is to be commended.
MAYOR=S REPORT
Mayor Fiala said he had to echo all of the comments, adding they should have been in the room when the announcement was made earlier in the day. He said everyone from P.A.R.T.A., KSU, and the City just roared. He said that is the best feeling he has had in years. Mayor Fiala said he has sat at the Council table before, adding they had a direction but were working in 102 different ways. He said this is the first time everyone is working in the same direction. He said it is for the betterment of Kent as a whole.
MOTION TO ADJOURN.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. DeLeone, and carried by a voice vote of 8-0.
Hearing no further business before this Council, Mayor Fiala adjourned this meeting at 9:50 p.m.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council Jerry T. Fiala, Mayor & President of Council
THE CITY OF KENT, OHIO
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WED., MARCH 3, 2010
This meeting of the Community Development Committee of Kent City Council was called to order by Erik Valenta, Chair, at 7:54 p.m. on Wed., March 3, 2010.
PRESENT: MR. AMRHEIN, MR. DELEONE, MR. FERRARA, MS. SHAFFER, MR. VALENTA, MS. WALLACH, AND MR. WILSON
ALSO PRESENT: J. FIALA, MAYOR; D. RULLER, CITY MANAGER; J. SILVER, LAW DIRECTOR; L. COPLEY, CLERK OF COUNCIL; D. SMITH, ECON. DEV. DIRECTOR; AND B. SUSEL, GRANTS ADMINISTRATOR.
ABSENT: MR. TURNER & MR. KUHAR
Dave Ruller, City Manager, explained that Dan Smith, Economic Development Director, would present information on a potential tenant for their Summit Street Incubator. He explained that Christian Edwards recently graduated, creating a vacancy. He said they have an application, and Mr. Smith is recommending authorization of a new lease.
Mr. Smith explained that two recent graduates have started permanent companies in Kent. He said right after they leased to Mr. Kutash, Scott Arrington, a barber, came in. He said Mr. Arrington has done some celebrity hair cuts, and he suggested he could bring in LeBron James for a haircut. Mr. Smith said that Mr. Arrington dreamed of opening his own business, has developed the plan and filled out the application. He said they started talking in October, and there was a waiting list. He said Mr. Arrington has a lot of creative ideas, adding this is the kind of person they want to help. He introduced Mr. Arrington at this time.
Scott Arrington: Mr. Arrington explained he is a graduate of Akron-Buchtel, having graduated in 1988. He said he attended the Akron Barber College, and graduated in 1998. He said he started working for one barber shop as the manager, and ran the operations. He said the man who owned it was Mr. James= barber, adding he dealt with Mr. Brown=s entourage. He said he likes what Kent is doing, adding it is on the rise, and he would like to be part of it. He thanked them for the opportunity.
Mr. Smith said Mr. Arrington has done some basketball coaching, adding he is excited to see Mr. Arrington get a chance. He asked for authorization of his lease.
Ms. Shaffer asked if he lives in Kent, and Mr. Arrington said he lives in Akron. Ms. Shaffer asked if he has clients, and he said he has a lot of them. He said some attend the university, adding he graduated with people involved with Black United Students. He said he is a referee for all sports, and has been around for a while. He said he knows the areas, and is familiar with the coaches and the kids.
Ms. Wallach asked if they have a rule or condition that a company must locate in Kent for so many years when they graduate, and Mr. Smith said they can go anywhere they want. He said if they stay in Kent, like Christian Edwards, they receive a $2500 graduation fee toward their rent. Mr. Arrington said he plans to stay in Kent, as he has a few other ideas. He said he has vendor=s license, State ID name registration, and his E.I.N. He said he is raring to go and is excited.
Mr. Valenta asked if they need the emergency clause, and Mr. Smith said he did not think it was necessary. Jim Smith, Law Director, suggested it would get Mr. Arrington in thirty days quicker, and Mr. Smith agreed.
There were no further question or audience comments at this time.
MOTION TO APPROVE THE LEASE FOR SCOTT ARRINGTON WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE.
Motion made by Mr. Wilson, seconded by Ms. Shaffer, and carried by a voice vote of 7-0.
Chair Valenta said the next issue on their agenda was the CDBG Program, FY2010. Mr. Ruller noted that the JRS grant had been deferred. He said Mr. Smith is working with K.R.B.A., and may come back at a later time. Mr. Ruller said Bridget Susel, Grants Administrator, would present the information on the CDBG Program at this time.
Ms. Susel said the City is currently developing their five-year plan, as required by the program, as well as their annual plan. She said the last five-year plan, from 2005 to 2009, focused on housing and supportive services. She said that while those are important initiatives, they would like to apply their CDBG monies to items with a larger neighborhood reach. She said it is because of their neighborhoods that they receive CDBG funds. Ms. Susel said they are areas with concentrations of incomes at 80% or below the median family income. She said they were trying to figure out how to prioritize their needs if they were going to do housing, supportive services and infrastructure.
Mr. Ferrara asked if it was 80% of the median income for the City, and Ms. Susel said it deals with average households. She said they are in with Akron. She said HUD tells them what the caps are per household. She said there are other factors, but primarily, they focus on high concentration. She said they have eight blocks that meet that criteria. She said that means they have 51% or more of the households are at 80% or less of the median income.
Ms. Susel said she worked with a County model for CDBG programs. She said that though they have limited resources, she would like to see how they can best utilize their funding. She said repairs are wonderful, but people do not see those repairs.
Ms. Susel displayed a slide with the nature of the projects to be funded and how many will be assisted. She said that some of the projects funded previously helped the same people, and she would like to see projects assisting new people. She said they also have some remaining funds, adding they can only have those monies on the books for eighteen months or less. She said if they do not use the money quickly, the need may not be as great.
Ms. Susel said for the 2010 Action Plan, they received ten proposals. She said they expected their allocation to be similar to last year, and also have about $29,000 in unprogrammed funds. She said with $431,000 in requests, they had to do some cutting.
Ms. Susel said the first project is the Pine Street Reconstruction for $116,000. Ms. Susel said the entire project is $490,000, and this would cover only a section between Cherry Street and Dodge Street. She said that many programs are done for a period of three to six years, and they will see Pine Street on the list for one or two more years.
Ms. Susel said that the Parks and Recreation Department asked for money for the Redmond Bridge renovation. She said there was an audit on the bridge, adding that the pictures were scary. Ms. Susel said the bridge is usable, but went from sixteen tons as a load limit to six tons and can no longer accommodate emergency vehicles. She said they are recommended some money, but added they have old funding on the books, and needs to utilize those funds first.
Ms. Susel said the Community Policing Program provides for additional patrols in areas of the City with subsidized housing, where they have calls for disturbances and criminal activity. She said this program provides community outreach.
Ms. Susel said the CAC Furnace Replacement Program is a great program, and those who benefit are at the lowest end of the income stream. She said she gets calls all of the time from people having difficulties with their furnaces. She said one lady thought it was a scam. Ms. Susel said that CAC does about thirteen furnaces annually. She said this is separate from their Rehab Program, and is an income drive grant, improving the energy efficiency in homes.
Ms. Wallach asked if this program replaces the entire furnace and whether a match is required by the owner, and Ms. Susel said it does, sometimes, require a full replacement. She said there are cases where a furnace just needs cleaned or repaired. She said in some cases, it is a full replacement. Ms. Susel said an evaluation is done, CAC gets a recommendation, it is bid, and replaced. She explained this is a grant, with no match required.
Ms. Susel said she is partial to the PATH program by Family and Community Services. She said there are a lot of people coming out of emergency shelter, with nowhere to go. She said they do not get a lot of money for the homeless, and there are a lot of life challenges for these people. She said this provides housing for twenty-four months, and although they service about ninety-five people annually, this is all they ask for annually.
Ms. Susel said the next program by Family and Community Services, the Homeless Shelter, is needed also. She said they have been turning people away every week for the last three and one-half months. She said they are one of the few to provide this important service, adding these types of activities are public service activities that are capped at 15%.
Ms. Susel said the next project was also by Family & Community Services, who wanted to replace the windows on their building on Gougler Avenue. She said she wanted to get away from operations and maintenance, and focus on community development. Ms. Susel said she spoke with Mark Frisone, their Executive Director, and he totally understood. She said he agreed there is more need in terms of the neighborhoods.
Ms. Susel said they are recommending funding for K.R.B.A., for their Small Business Development Center and the Business Incubator. She said they provide counseling to help low income people, also providing assistance so the people know how to maintain and manage their money.
Ms. Susel said that Coleman Professional Services requested $3300 for an electrical upgrade. She said she had a similar discussion with their Executive Director, Nelson Burns, who also said he would like to see ways to expand housing and other needs.
Ms. Susel said they received a proposal from the Community Legal Aid. She said she is quite impressed with this program, adding they served 280 people in Kent last year. Ms. Susel said she receives at least one call a week for people facing foreclosures and similar situations. She said this is a service that is used a lot, and it was never on the City=s radar. She said that although she cannot fund them under this program, She suggested they submit money through the Social Services line item.
Ms. Susel said the next two items, Administration and Fair Housing, are required as part of the CDBG program, and must fall under the 20% cap.
Mr. Valenta asked if they needed the emergency clause, and Ms. Susel said they do not, as it is not due until June.
There were no further questions or any audience comments at this time.
MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CDBG PROGRAM, FY2010, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. Amrhein, and carried by a voice vote of 7-0.
Hearing no further business before this Committee, Chair Valenta adjourned this meeting at 8:15 p.m.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
1. TO AUTHORIZE THE LEASE WITH SCOTT ARRINGTON, FOR THE SUMMIT STREET INCUBATOR, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE.
2. TO AUTHORIZE THE CDBG PROGRAM, FY2010, WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE.
Draft No. 10-13
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2005-34, PASSED APRIL 20, 2005; AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 2007-15, PASSED FEBRUARY 7, 2007, SO AS TO AMEND THE BRIMFIELD-KENT JOINT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CONTRACT TO AMEND THE TAX RATE BEGINNING ON JAN. 1, 2011 AND FOR SUBSEQUENT YEARS.
WHEREAS, previously, the City of Kent passed Ordinance No. 2005-34 on April 20, 2005, so as to entering into a Brimfield-Kent Joint Economic District Contract with the Township of Brimfield, in accordance with Sections 715.72 to 715.83 of the Revised Code for their mutual benefit; and
WHEREAS, previously, the City and Township passed Ordinance No. 2007-15, passed February 7, 2007, so as to amend the contract to redefine the boundaries of the Brimfield-Kent Joint Economic District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 17, 2010; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Township desire to amend the Contract so as to amend the tax rate beginning on Jan. 1, 2011 and for subsequent years.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Kent, Portage County, Ohio, at least a majority (5) of all members elected thereto concurring:
SECTION 1. This Council approves the Amendment to the tax rate of the Brimfield-Kent Joint Economic Development District contract, now on file with the Clerk of Council, and authorizes the City Manager and the Director of Law to sign the Amendment.
SECTION 3. A copy of the text of the Amendment and other documents referred to in Section 1 shall remain on file in the office of the Clerk of Council.
SECTION 4. The City Manager, the Director of Law, the City Manager and other City officials, as appropriate, are each authorized to take such actions, or to cause such actions to be taken, on behalf of the City, including signing agreements or other instruments contemplated by the Amendment or deemed necessary or appropriate by the Director of Law, in order to achieve approval of the Amendment within the Township and to accomplish the purposes of this Ordinance and the Amendment.
SECTION 6. That it is found and determined that all formal actions of this Council concerning and relating to the adoption of this Ordinance were adopted in an open meeting of this Council and that all deliberations of this Council, and of any of its committees that resulted in such formal action, were in meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements of Section 121.22 of the Ohio.
SECTION 7. That this Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest date allowed by law.
PASSED:
DATE MAYOR & PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL
ATTEST:
CLERK OF COUNCIL
I hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2010-____ was duly enacted on this ___ day of ________, 2010, by the Council of the City of Kent, Ohio.
CLERK OF COUNCIL
Draft No. 10-29
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO ENTER INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH SCOTT J. ARRINGTON dba THE BUZZ, LLC FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 203 EAST SUMMIT STREET, KENT, OHIO AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the Kent City Council wishes to enter into a Lease Agreement with Scott J. Arrington dba The Buzz, LLC for property owned by the City and located at 203 East Summit Street, Kent; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Kent, Portage County, Ohio, at least three-fourths (3/4) of all members elected thereto concurring:
SECTION 1. That Kent City Council does hereby authorize the City Manager, or his designee to enter into a Lease Agreement with Scott J. Arrington dba The Buzz, LLC, for property located at 203 East summit Street, in substantial conformity with a copy of which is marked as Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. That it is found and determined that all formal actions of this Council concerning and relating to the adoption of this ordinance were adopted in an open meeting of this Council and that all deliberations of this Council, and of any of its committees that resulted in such formal action, were in meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements of Section 121.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.
SECTION 3. That this Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the residents of this City, for which reason and other reasons manifest to this Council this Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure and shall take effect and be in force immediately after passage.
PASSED: _______________________________________
DATE MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL
ATTEST:_____________________________
CLERK OF COUNCIL
I hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2010- was duly enacted this day of
, 2010 by the Council of the City of Kent, Ohio.
_____________________________________
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LEASE
THIS LEASE, made at Kent, Ohio this ____ day of April, 2010, by and between the CITY OF KENT, Ohio, as “Lessor”, SCOTT ARRINGTON dba THE BUZZ, LLC. as “Lessee”.
Description of Leased Premises
Lessor agrees to lease to Lessee and Lessee agrees to lease from Lessor, the space presently constituted known as 203 East Summit Street, referred to below as “the premises” in the City of Kent, Portage County, State of Ohio, referred to below as the building.
SECTION II
Term
The space is leased for a term beginning on April 1, 2010 and to end March 31, 2015, or on an earlier time and date as this lease may terminate as provided below, except that, if the date falls on a Sunday or a holiday, then this lease shall end at midnight on the business day which precedes the above-mentioned date. By agreement of the parties, the lease may not be extended beyond March 31, 2015. In addition, this lease may be terminated at any time by agreement of the parties with a ninety (90) day notice period.
SECTION III
Rent
The total annual rent for:
1. April 1, 2010 through March 31, 2011 (year one) is the sum of $3,476.00, which is payable in twelve (12) equal monthly $289.66 installments, in advance, on the first day of each calendar month during the term, beginning April 1, 2010.
2. The lease rate for subsequent years will be adjusted annually on June 1 unless otherwise noted in the lease agreement. The rate adjustment will be based on a five (5) year average of the Cleveland-Akron PMSA Consumer Price Index as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. In the event that the average rate of change of the Consumer Price Index over the most current five (5) year period is negative, the lease rates will remain constant. Lessor will notify Lessee of the changes to the lease.
Use and Occupancy
Lessee agrees to use and occupy the premises for a hair cutting service and for no other purpose. Lessor represents that the premises may lawfully be used for the stated purpose.
SECTION V
Lessee shall pay rent, and any additional rent as provided below, to Lessor at Moneypenny Realty & Management, LLC, 237 East Main Street, PO Box 1073, Kent, Ohio 44240. Lessor may designate in writing another location for payment of rent, without demand and without counterclaim, deduction, or setoff.
SECTION VI
Care and Repair of Premises
Lessee shall not commit any act of waste and shall take good care of the premises and the fixtures and appurtenances on it, and shall, in the use and occupancy of the premises, conform to all laws, orders, and regulations of the federal, state, and municipal governments or any of their departments. Lessor shall make all necessary repairs to the premises, except where the repair has been made necessary by misuse or neglect by Lessee or Lessee's agents, servants, visitors or licensees. All improvements made by Lessee to the premises which are attached to the premises so that they cannot be removed without material injury to the premises, shall become the property of Lessor upon installation.
Not later than the last day of the term Lessee shall, at Lessee's expense, remove all of Lessee's personal property and those improvements made by Lessee which are not the property of Lessor, including trade fixtures, cabinet work, movable paneling, partitions and the like; repair all injury done by or in connection with the installation or removal of the property and improvements; and surrender the premises in as good condition as they were at the beginning of the term, reasonable wear, and damage by fire, the elements, casualty, or other cause not due to the misuse or neglect by Lessee or Lessee's agents, servants, visitors or licensees, excepted. All property of Lessee remaining on the premises after the last day of the term of this lease shall be conclusively deemed abandoned and may be removed by Lessor, and Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for the cost of the removal. Lessor may have any property left on the premises stored at Lessee's risk and expense.
Lessor shall be responsible for snow removal from the parking lot and sidewalks.
SECTION VII
Alterations, Additions or Improvements
Lessee shall not, without first obtaining the written consent of Lessor (by and through the City Service Director), make any alterations, additions or improvements in, to or about the premises.
The premises shall be returned to their original conditions (as of April 1, 2010) by Lessee when they vacate the premises.
Lessor agrees to address the following matters: NONE
SECTION VIII
Prohibition Against Activities Increasing Fire Insurance Rates
Lessee shall not do or permit any activity on the premises, which will cause an increase in the rate of fire insurance on the building.
SECTION IX
Disposal of Waste or Refuse Matter
Lessee shall not permit the disposal of waste or refuse matter on the leased premises or anywhere in or near the building.
Lessee agrees to pay for trash service for the premises leased. Lessee shall comply with any recycling rules, regulations and ordinances imposed. Lessor may charge Lessee for inappropriate disposal of trash.
SECTION X
Abandonment
Lessee shall not, without first obtaining the written consent of the Lessor, abandon the premises, or allow the premises to become vacant or deserted.
SECTION XI
Assignment of Sublease
Lessee shall not, without first obtaining the written consent of the Lessor, assign, mortgage, pledge, or encumber this lease, in whole or in part, or sublet the premises or any part of the premises. This covenant shall be binding upon the legal representatives of Lessee, and upon every person to whom Lessee's interest under this lease passes by operation of law, but shall not apply to an assignment or subletting to the parent or subsidiary of a corporate Lessee or to a transfer of the leasehold interest occasioned by a consolidation or merger involving Lessee.
SECTION XII
Compliance with Rules and Regulations
Lessee shall observe and comply with any rules and regulations which may exist, which are made part of this agreement, and with any further reasonable rules and regulations as Lessor may prescribe, on written notice to the Lessee, for the safety, care, and cleanliness of the building and the comfort, quiet, and convenience of other occupants of the building.
SECTION XIII
Heat
Lessee agrees to pay for the heating of the premises leased.
SECTION XIV
Water
Lessee agrees to pay for water charges as registered on the water meter and for sewer charges of the premises leased.
SECTION XV
Electricity
Lessee agrees to pay for electricity charges of the premises leased.
SECTION XVI
Damages to Building
If the building is damaged by fire or any other cause to the extent that the cost of restoration, as reasonably estimated by Lessor, will equal or exceed forty (40) percent of the replacement value of the building, exclusive of foundations, just prior to the occurrence of the damage, then Lessor may, no later than the 15th day following the damage, give Lessee a notice of election to terminate this lease, or if the cost of restoration will equal or exceed forty (40) percent of the replacement value and if the premises are not reasonably usable for the purposes for which they are leased under this agreement, then Lessee may, no later than the 15th day following the damage, give Lessor a notice of election to terminate this lease. In event of either election this lease shall terminate on the third day after Lessor gives notice to Lessee, and Lessee shall surrender possession of the premises within a reasonable time, and the rent, and any additional rent, shall be apportioned as of the date of the surrender and any rent paid for any period beyond that date shall be repaid to tenant.
In any case in which use of the premises is affected by any damage to the building, there shall be either an abatement or an equitable reduction in rent depending on the period for which and the extent to which the premises are not reasonably usable for the purpose for which they are leased under this agreement. The words "restoration" and "restore" as used in this Section XVI include repairs. If the damage results from the fault of the Lessee, or Lessee's agents, servants, visitors, or licensees, Lessee shall not be entitled to any abatement or reduction of rent, except to the extent, if any, that Lessor receives the proceeds of rent insurance in lieu of the rent.
SECTION XVII
Waivers of Subrogation
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section VI of this lease, in any event of loss or damage to the building, the premises and/or any contents, each party shall look first to any insurance in its favor before making any claim against the other party; and, to the extent possible without additional cost, each party shall obtain, for each policy of insurance, provisions permitting waiver of any claim against the other party for loss or damage within the scope of the insurance, and each party, to the extent permitted, for itself and its insurers waives all insured claims against the other party.
SECTION XVIII
Eminent Domain
If the cost of restoration as estimated by Lessor amounts to less than forty (40) percent of the replacement value of the building, or if, despite the cost, Lessor does not elect to terminate this lease, Lessor shall restore the building and the premises with reasonable promptness, subject to delays beyond Lessor's control and delays in the making of insurance adjustments between Lessor and its insurance carrier, and Lessee shall have no right to terminate this lease except as provided in this agreement. Lessor need not restore fixture and improvements owned by tenant.
If the premises or any part of the premises or any estate in the premises, or any other part of the building materially affecting Lessee's use of the premises, is taken by eminent domain, this lease shall terminate on the date when title vests pursuant to the taking. The rent, and any additional rent, shall be apportioned as of the termination date and any rent paid for any period beyond that date shall be repaid to Lessee. Lessee shall not be entitled to any part of the award for the taking or any payment in lieu of payment, but Lessee may file a claim for any taking of fixtures and improvements owned by Lessee, and for moving expenses.
SECTION XIX
Lessor's Remedies on Default
If Lessee defaults in the payment of rent, or any additional rent, or defaults in the performance of any of the other covenants or conditions of this agreement, Lessor may give Lessee notice of the default. If Lessee does not cure any rent, or additional rent, default within thirty (30) days, or other default within thirty (30) days, after notice is given or if the other default is of a nature that it cannot be completely cured within that period, Lessee does not commence curing within thirty (30) days and thereafter proceed with reasonable diligence and in good faith to cure the default, then Lessor may terminate this lease on not less than three (3) days' notice to Lessee. On the date specified in the notice the term of this lease shall terminate and Lessee shall then quit and surrender the premises to Lessor, but Lessee shall remain liable as provided in Section XX. If this lease is terminated by Lessor, Lessor may at any time after termination resume possession of the premises by any lawful means and remove Lessee or other occupants and its or their effect.
SECTION XX
Deficiency
In any case where Lessor has recovered possession of the premises by reason of Lessee's default, Lessor may, at Lessor's option, occupy the premises or cause the premises to be redecorated, altered, divided, consolidated with other adjoining premises, or otherwise changed or prepared for reletting, and may relet the premises or any part of the premises as agent of Lessee or otherwise, for a term or terms to expire prior to, at the same time as, or subsequent to, the original expiration date of this lease, at Lessor's option, and receive the rent as agreed under the lease. Any rent received shall be applied first to the payment of expenses Lessor may incur in connection with the recovery of possession, redecorating, altering, dividing, consolidating with other adjoining premises, or otherwise changing or preparing for reletting, and reletting, including brokerage and reasonable attorneys' fees, and then to the payment of damages in amounts equal to the rent under this agreement and to the cost and expenses of performance of the other covenants of Lessee as provided in this agreement. Lessee agrees, in the above described circumstances, whether or not Lessor has relet, to pay to Lessor damages equal to the rent and other sums agreed to, less the net proceeds of the reletting. The damages shall be payable by Lessee on the several rent days above specified. In reletting the premises, Lessor may grant rent concessions, and Lessee shall not be credited with the concessions. No reletting shall constitute a surrender and acceptance or be deemed evidence of a surrender and acceptance. If Lessor elects, pursuant to this agreement, actually to occupy and use the premises or any part of the premises during any part of the balance of the term as originally fixed or since extended, there shall be allowed against Lessee's obligation for rent or damages as defined in this agreement, during the period of Lessor's occupancy, the reasonable value of the occupancy, not to exceed in any event the rent reserved and the occupancy shall not be construed as a relief of Lessee's liability under this agreement.
Lessee waives all right of redemption to which Lessee or any person claiming under Lessee might be entitled by any law now or later in force. Lessor's remedies under this agreement are in addition to any remedy allowed by law.
SECTION XXI
Effect of Failure to Insist on Strict Compliance with Conditions
The failure of either party to insist on strict performance of any covenant or condition of this agreement, or to exercise any option contained in this agreement, shall not be construed as a waiver of the covenant, condition, or option in any other instance. This lease cannot be changed or terminated orally.
SECTION XXII
Collection of Rent from any Occupant
If the premises are sublet or occupied by anyone other than Lessee and Lessee is in default under this agreement, or if this lease is assigned by Lessee, Lessor may collect rent from the assignee, subtenant, or occupant, and apply the net amount collected to the rent reserved. The collection shall not be deemed a waiver of the covenant against assignment and subletting, or on acceptance of the assignee, subtenant, or occupant as lessee, or a release of Lessee from further performance of the covenants contained in this agreement.
SECTION XXIII
Subordination of Lease
This lease shall be subject and subordinate to all underlying leases and to mortgages and trust deeds which now or subsequently affect the leases or the real property of which the premises form a part, and also to all renewals, modifications, consolidations, and replacement of the underlying leases and the mortgages and trust deeds. Although no instrument or act on the part of Lessee shall be necessary to effectuate the subordination, Lessee will, nevertheless, execute and deliver instruments confirming the subordination of this lease as may be desired by the holders of the mortgages and trust deeds or by any of the Lessors under the underlying leases. Lessee agrees to appoint Lessor attorney in fact, irrevocably, to execute and deliver any of the above described instrument for Lessee. If any underlying lease to which this lease is subject terminates, Lessee shall, on timely request, attorn to the owner of the reversion.
SECTION XXIV
Security Deposit
Lessee agrees to deposit with Lessor upon signing of this lease the sum of $289.66 as security for the performance of Lessee's obligations under this lease, including without limitation the surrender of possession of the premises to Lessor as provided in this agreement. If Lessor applies any part of the deposit to cure any default of Lessee, Lessee shall upon demand deposit with Lessor the amount applied so that Lessor shall have the full deposit on hand at all times during the term of this lease. Lessee’s deposit will be returned at upon termination of the lease if the premises are retuned in acceptable condition.
SECTION XXV
Lessor's Right To Cure Lessee's Breach
If Lessee breaches any covenant or condition of this lease, Lessor may, on reasonable notice to Lessee (except that no notice need be given in case of emergency), cure the breach at the expense of Lessee. The reasonable amount of all expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred by Lessor in curing the breach, whether paid by Lessor or not, shall be deemed additional rent payable on demand.
SECTION XXVI
Mechanics Lien
Lessee shall within fifteen (15) days after notice from Lessor discharge any mechanics liens for materials or labor claimed to have been furnished to the premises on Lessee's behalf.
SECTION XXVII
Notices
Any notice by either party to the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed proper only if delivered personally or sent by registered or certified mail in an addressed postpaid envelope; if to Lessee, at the above described building (203 East Summit Street, Kent, Ohio 44240); if to Lessor, at 215 East Summit Street, Kent, Ohio 44240; or, to either, at another address as Lessee or Lessor, respectively, may designate in writing. Notice shall be deemed properly given, if delivered personally, upon delivery, and if mailed, upon the third day after mailing.
SECTION XXVIII
Lessor's Right To Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance
Lessor may enter the premises at any reasonable time, upon adequate notice to Lessee (except that no notice need be given in case of emergency) for the purpose of inspection or to make repairs, replacements, or additions in, to, on and about the premises or the building, as Lessor deems necessary or desirable. Lessee shall have no claim or cause of action against Lessor by reason of entry for these purposes except as provided in Section XXXIII of this agreement.
The Lessee agrees to meet with Community Development Department and other City staff on an annual basis to assess the Lessee’s progress towards growth strategies and attainment of goals that were agreed to during the original application process.
SECTION XXIX
Interruption of Services or Use
Interruption or curtailment of any service maintained in the building, if caused by strikes, mechanical difficulties, or any causes beyond Lessor's control whether similar or dissimilar to those enumerated, shall not entitle Lessee to any claim against Lessor or to any abatement in rent, and shall not constitute constructive or partial eviction, unless Lessor fails to take such measures as may be reasonable in the circumstances to restore the service without delay. If the premises are rendered untenantable in whole or part, for a period of fifteen (15) business days, due to repairs, replacements, or additions, other than those made with Lessee's consent or caused by misuse or neglect by Lessee or Lessee's agents, servants, visitors, or licensees, there shall be a proportionate abatement of rent during the period of untenantability.
SECTION XXX
Conditions of Lessor's Liability
Lessee may not claim a constructive eviction from the premises unless Lessee has first notified Lessor in writing of the condition or conditions giving rise to the eviction, and, if the complaints are justified, unless Lessor fails within a reasonable time after receipt of notice to remedy the conditions.
SECTION XXXI
Lessor's Right To Show Premises
Lessor may show the premises to prospective purchasers and mortgagees and, during the six (6) months prior to termination of this lease, to prospective tenants, during business hours upon reasonable notice to Lessee.
SECTION XXXII
Effect of Other Representations
No representations or promises shall be binding on the parties to this agreement except those representations and promises contained in this agreement or in some future writing signed by the party making the representations or promises.
SECTION XXXIII
Peaceful Enjoyment
Lessor covenants that if, and for as long as Lessee pays the rent, and any additional rent as provided in this agreement, and performs the covenants of this lease, Lessee shall peaceably and quietly have, hold, and enjoy the premises for the term mentioned, subject to the provisions of this lease.
SECTION XXXIV
Lessee's Certification as to Force and Effect of Lease
Lessee shall, from time to time, upon not less than five (5) days' prior written request by Lessor, execute, acknowledge, and deliver to Lessor a written statement certifying that the lease is unmodified and in full force and effect, or that the lease is in full force and effect as modified and listing the instruments of modification; the dates to which the rents and other charges have been paid; and, whether or not to the best of Lessee's knowledge Lessor is in default under this lease and, if so, specifying the nature of the default. It is intended that any statement delivered according to this Section may be relied upon by a prospective purchaser of Lessor's interest or mortgagee of Lessor's interest or assignee of any mortgage upon Lessor's interest in the building.
SECTION XXXV
Waiver of Jury Trial
To the extent permitted by law, the parties waive trial by jury in any action or proceeding brought in connection with this lease or the premises.
SECTION XXXVI
Section Headings
The section headings in this lease are intended for convenience only and shall not be taken into consideration in any construction or interpretation of this lease or any of its provisions.
SECTION XXXVII
Binding Effect on Successors and Assigns
The provisions of this lease shall apply to, bind, and inure to the benefit of Lessor and Lessee and their respective heirs, successors, legal representatives, and assigns. It is understood that the term "Lessor" as used in this lease means only the owner, a mortgagee in possession, or a term Lessee of the building, so that in the event of any sale of the building or of any lease of the building, of if a mortgagee takes possession of the premises, the Lessor named in this agreement shall be entirely freed and relieved of all covenants and obligations of Lessor subsequently accruing under this agreement. The purchaser, the term Lessee of the building, or the mortgagee in possession has assumed and agreed to carry out any and all covenants and obligations of the Lessor under this agreement.
SECTION XXXVIII
Insurance.
1. Lessee shall protect, save harmless and indemnify Lessor against and from (i) any penalties, damages, charges or costs (including reasonable attorneys fees) imposed or resulting from any violation of any law, order of governmental agency or ordinance by Lessee, (ii) all claims, losses, costs, damages or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or from Lessee's occupancy of the Premises, and (iii) any and all losses, costs, damages or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of any failure of Lessee in any material respect to comply with or perform all of the requirements and provisions of this Lease.
2. Lessee shall, at Lessee's cost and expense, procure and continue in force, in the name of Lessor, Lessor’s mortgagee(s) and Lessee, as their interests may appear, general liability insurance coverage against injuries to persons and property occurring in, or upon the Premises, during the term of this Lease, such insurance at all times to be in a single limit amount of not less than $500,000 per incident and One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) in the aggregate. Such insurance shall be written with a company or companies authorized to engage in the business of general liability insurance in the State of Ohio, and there shall be delivered to Lessor customary insurance certification evidencing such insurance and copies of the policies. Such insurance shall further provide that the same may not be cancelled, terminated or modified unless the insurer gives Lessor at least fifteen (15) days' prior written notice thereof.
3. Lessor, at Lessor's expense, shall maintain special form or "All-Risk" property insurance insuring the Premises and other improvements on the land but not Lessee's contents or personal property located on the Premises.
SECTION XXXIX
Waiver of Relocation Benefits
The below signed Lessees of the property located at 203 East Summit Street, Kent Ohio, hereby acknowledge and agree that each, jointly and severally, is a tenant in the described premises for a five (5) year term pursuant to this lease of even date herewith with the City of Kent as the owner and Lessor of the premises.
The below signed further acknowledge that either party may terminate the written lease upon giving the other the requisite notice provided for in the lease.
Upon receipt of such notice, the below signed agree to vacate the premises in accordance with the terms of the lease without any compensation due the below signed from the Lessor for exercising its rights under the lease.
The below signed hereby waive and release Lessor from having to pay to the below signed, their successors, administrators and assigns, any relocation benefit or payments in the event Lessor, City of Kent, exercises its rights under the terms of the lease to terminate the lease for any reason, with or without cause.
Relocation Incentive
Lessee will be eligible to receive a $500.00 per year rebate on their rental rate, up to $2,000.00, provided Lessee locates with in the City of Kent at the end of the term of this lease agreement.
SCOTT J. ARRINGTON CITY OF KENT, OHIO
dba THE BUZZ, LLC.
By: ______________________________ By: _________________________________
Scott J. Arrington David Ruller, City Manager
Date: _____________________________ Date: _______________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
James R. Silver, Law Director
THE CITY OF KENT, OHIO
FINANCE COMMITTEE
WED., FEB. 17, 2010
This meeting of the Finance Committee of Kent City Council was called to order on Wed., Feb. 17, 2010 at 7:41 p.m. by Wayne Wilson, Chair.
PRESENT: MR. AMRHEIN, MR. DELEONE, MR. FERRARA, MR. KUHAR, MS. SHAFFER, MR. VALENTA, MS. WALLACH, AND MR. WILSON
ALSO PRESENT: J. FIALA, MAYOR & PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL; D. RULLER, CITY MANAGER; J. SILVER, LAW DIRECTOR; L. COPLEY, CLERK OF COUNCIL; W. LILLICH, SAFETY DIRECTOR; J. BOWLING, CITY ENGINEER; D. COFFEE, DIR. OF BUDGET & FINANCE; AND G. LOCKE, DIR. OF COMM. DEV.
ABSENT: MR. TURNER
The first item on the agenda was the 2010 Appropriations ordinance. Chair Wilson said that for twenty-six weeks out of the year, they control what goes into the budget, by the policy decisions they make, which is their job. He said they have already dictated what they want in the budget.
Chair Wilson said they asked for a 2% reduction, and the Manager came in with a 3.1% reduction. He said it is admirable that staff went above and beyond.
Chair Wilson said they will discuss each tab, and can ask their questions at that time. He said he hoped to be done with the budget with this meeting.
Dave Ruller, City Manager, explained that the other item on their agenda, the AMATS application for the multi modal facility, was removed from the agenda because of the award of $20 million from the federal government.
Mr. Ruller said he hoped they all read his lengthy introduction. He said all department heads are present to answer their questions. Mr. Ruller said this was Dave Coffee, Dir. of Budget & Finance=s first foray into the budget process. He said Mr. Coffee, although still in the learning curve, has done an admirable job. He said he told him not to hesitate to lean on the department heads, as they know their budgets inside and out.
Mr. Ruller said he appreciated Mr. Wilson=s remarks, adding he hoped they realized that while there was a target number, the staff is committed to finding savings every day. He said he feels good about what has been done in the last five years. He said it does not always show as a one-to-one reduction in the budget, because while they save money in one spot, other areas eat it. He said in many respects, they helped the amount the budget is pushed up each year through inflation, utilities, etc. He said there are not a lot of discretionary dollars. He said if they get to the point where they need to make more changes, they could decide that capital is discretionary. He said it would require their discussion on policies.
Mr. Ruller said that given Council=s commitments, the budget has no surprises, and is essentially the same budget they had before. He said Mayor Fiala said it looked like the same budget as when he was on previously.
Mr. Ruller said some numbers do go up, with the pressures of payroll and health insurance. He said he feels good about how competitive they have been. He said their wages have lagged based on regional and national averages. He said he felt they may want some of that data. Mr. Ruller said their health insurance has increased, but they have stayed below the average rate of increases.
Mr. Ruller said at the end of the day, they decreased the budget, in their discretionary areas, by about 3.1%. He said the staff feels that 5% is achievable. He said they are going to keep doing things like the Adopt-A-Spot program and the consolidation of the health plan into one option. He said those things should begin to pay off in the course of the year. Mr. Ruller said they will certainly aim for higher cuts, as it is their commitment to do more with less.
Mr. Ruller said the budget does not dismantle any programs or services, as that was not Council=s desire. He said as long as they maintain a prudent, undesignated fund balance, they understood Council to say they will tolerate occasional use of those funds before they layoff people or cut the services.
Mr. Ruller said they are fortunate that their local economy has the benefit of a fairly stable institution, which is Kent State, who provides 40% of their income tax. He said it is one of the few areas that have remained stable, and experienced a little grown.
Mr. Ruller said this is the second year those total revenues are down. He said what is troubling them this year is that their income tax is down. He said it is not down as much as the county, regional or state averages. He said they are “less worse,” but still worse than they were a year earlier. He said they need to do something to get in front of the problem. He said they did not feel they could cut their way out of it. He said they need to do strategic improvements, efficiencies, etc., but need to make the right investments to help turn the economy around. He said that is their direction, based on Council=s desire.
Mr. Ruller said that is the premise of what the budget is based on. He said he instructed the Budget & Finance Director, based on a planning meeting with Mr. Wilson, to keep the format the same as previous years. He asked they try to keep the discussion elevated at the division/department level. He said they are available to answer any questions on any line items, but the goal was to review it section by section.
Mr. Ruller emphasized the importance of passing something. He said they do have a fiduciary responsibility to pass a budget by the end of March, when their temporary appropriations expire. He said they do not have the statutory authority to go further once it expires. Mr. Ruller said the course of business for them is to get something passed. He said if it is something that they are less than satisfied with, he asked their indulgence to get it passed and they will revisit those issues.
Mr. Ruller said the budget is amended throughout the year. He said they can adjust things up or down, as warranted. Mr. Ruller said they are willing to do that, but the top priority is to have something passed so they have a city in operation on April 1. He said a lot of that will be driven by the number of votes and suspension of the three readings. He said if there are enough votes to suspend the three readings, they will not need extra meetings. He said if that does not happen, they will need two more meetings the following week.
David Coffee, Dir. Of Budget & Finance: Mr. Coffee said he wanted to acknowledge and extend his public appreciation to the city staff for their immense help in putting the proposed budget document together. He said this was a collaborative effort. Mr. Coffee said in the process of putting this together, staff imparted to him a lot of critical information. He said he could not have compiled it without their assistance, adding it was a citywide collaborative effort.
Mr. Coffee said he is still relatively new to the organization, and this process affords him the opportunity to become immersed into the City=s operations. He said he has made a number of notes for future reference, with ways they can modify the process in 2011. He said he hoped to provide more clarity for the casual reader of the document. He said the staff welcomes suggestions on ways they can revise and improve the process as they go forward.
Mr. Coffee said the revenue forecast is fiscally conservative. He said their income tax actual receipts ended up with -2.15% change over 2008. He said they had $10,482,215, which represented $230,000 less than 2008.
Mr. Ruller said this is an adjusted figure, representing their net taxes, and not the gross. Mr. Coffee agreed, adding they originally budgeted $11,100,000, which had $150,000 imbedded, representing estimated income tax refunds. He said they never had revenues of $11,100,000, but were working with $10,950,000. He said in this year=s presentation, they have made an adjustment to forecast their budget on a net basis. He said it makes more sense operationally and provides more clarity to Council. He said that R.I.T.A. remits their monies based on the net of refunds, so it seems the logical way to budget accordingly.
Mr. Coffee said on Page 1-1, Revenue Category Comparison, they forecast $10,500,000, adding it is a level forecast. He said that numerically, it is a -.17% increase, which is negligible in terms of percentages and dollar amounts. He said they took a long, hard look at that number to determine if it is a valid premise. He said they believe that when they look at the balance of factors that going into income tax receipts, it seems to be a reasonable assumption for this fiscal year.
Ms. Shaffer asked if they built in the development projects, such as Kent State=s projects and the bridge, adding that while the jobs are temporary, they will get revenue if they make an effort to capture the revenue stream, and Mr. Coffee said that was a good point. He said that was one of their considerations, adding they know what is on the horizon for Kent State with their building plan, and they know what the City has in the pipeline for their own capital projects. He said they expect income tax receipts from that as well. He said they looked at those components, as well as the more recent trends, such as the filing of new unemployment claims, and reviewed a lot of indicators to get a sense of which direction it is going. He said his hope is that it is an underestimate, but it seemed to be the prudent number to come up with. He said it is an estimate, but the staff believes it is a reasonable estimate to base operations on in 2010.
Mr. Ruller said Mr. Wilson has asked about the R.I.T.A. bump they were expecting. He said one of the selling points was their ability to access federal tax tapes. He said that R.I.T.A. can collect federal tapes for Kent. He said they did surveys of other cities who went to R.I.T.A., and once the tapes hit, they saw a bump of 6-10% in income tax receipts. He said that timing has not worked to their advantage, as they made their decision too late to get the tapes. He said he wished he could tell them they would see a big bump in 2010, but he felt if there is going to be a bump, it would be in 2011. He said it is frustrating, because this was the principal reason, in addition to the automation, that they went with R.I.T.A.
Mr. Coffee said the remainder of their taxes was a mixed bag. He said they are projecting an actual net change of -0.28%, which is a negligible increase, but is a level projection.
Mr. Coffee said that with respect to user charges, Council approved rate increases to the sewer and water rates that went into effect in February. He said they are looking at an overall projected increase of 2% in 2010.
Mr. Coffee said the next category works with Federal, State, and Local aid. He said this relates, predominantly, to their grant-related activity. He said it is tied to their capital projects, and the percentage increase is 1.85%, adding that it has offsetting expenses tied to those grants.
Mr. Coffee said they are Afeeling the hurt@ in their interest earnings, which have dropped off. He said this is a problem everyone is facing, adding they all want a decent return on their portfolio. He said they are looking at a 37% decrease in interest earnings. He said the interest is part of their Miscellaneous category, adding that they are looking at a total projection of -8%. Mr. Coffee said when they take the CAP-related revenue out of the project, they are looking at a -1.17% projection.
Mr. Coffee said they tried to be fiscally conservative on the expense side of the budget, adding it is a delicate balancing act. He said they want to be sure they have adequate monies to cover their operating expenses, but do not want to pad the budget. He said they wanted to keep Council=s objectives. Mr. Coffee said he would view the budgeted expenses as a Anot to exceed@ figure. He said he has great confidence in his peers, and knows their philosophies that they will spend when the need is there, and will not spend just to spend money.
Ms. Wallach asked if he was speaking to Page 1-5, and Mr. Coffee said he is not there yet, and was just making general remarks. Mr. Coffee said there are fifty-two cost centers in the book. He offered kudos to his coworkers and their staffs for their efforts to exercise restraint in their numbers. He said there are a few common threads on those pages that the Finance Department puts into the budget, including fuel costs, utility costs, insurance and bonding costs. He said in many cases, they may show an overall decrease, but when the fuel, utility, insurance and bonding costs were added, the figures became skewed.
Mr. Coffee said some increases were attributed to the utility increases and fuel increases. He said they took a hard, long look when trying to estimate their fuel. He said they also did a five-year review of the actual consumption, and prices paid, to derive responsible, valid forecasts as to what 2010 may look like. He said he even tapped his friends, who are energy traders, and they did not know any more than he did.
Mr. Coffee said they used the premise of 95,000 gallons consumed, with an average paid price of $3.00 per gallon. He said it sounds high today, but they try to look at all variables, so they can immunize themselves on future price increases. He said this is a very volatile component of the expense budget, as they cannot directly control the price paid at the pump. He said the price could be driven up considerably with a few flare ups in the Middle East; or a refinery that goes offline in the United States. He said they felt that $3.00 per gallon was a valid premise for projecting their fuel expense. He said they also did some reallocation between various departments and cost centers, so some of those figures are skewed also.
Mr. Coffee said the net combined increase for utilities was 4% overall. He said that is also subject to some speculation, such as weather conditions and the price of natural gas. He said in 2009, they expended about $1 million in utility expenses, and are forecasting $1,028,000 for 2010.
Mr. Kuhar said he was surprised they have an increased utility cost. He asked if the program to revamp all of their utilities starts in 2010, with a guaranteed reduction savings, and Mr. Coffee said that was taken into consideration. He said it will be a progressive process for implementation and installation of those components. He suggested Mr. Roberts could speak to the actual schedule, but they are not relying on benefits for the entire twelve months. He said the derived benefits could be for a partial year, at best. He said the 4% increase was not an overstatement of that projection. Mr. Coffee said his hope is they will be well under the projected utility expense. He said he would appreciate anything less than that, adding that is why he views it as a Anot to exceed amount.@
Gene Roberts, Service Director, reminded them they applied for a government grant to offset the cost of the energy improvements. He said they would not have implementation until after the winter is over.
Mr. Coffee said the last common thread had to do with insurance and bonding. He said there are changes on the individual cost centers, skewing the outcomes. He said they discovered that there was a questionable allocation between the bonding expense side and the actual insurance side. He said they went to their insurer, and asked for a closer look. He said they returned with a considerable shift, which is a far more reasonable allocation. He said it is a significant reduction in the bonding portion of their coverage. He said they also did a complete fleet audit to reevaluate what they are covering and at what level. He said they found some opportunities to further reduce the cost. Mr. Coffee said the net effect, overall, is about a $1,000 savings. He said there is a change in how the cost is allocated in the individual budgets.
Mr. Coffee said the first section is the General Government section. He said they are looking at a total of $3.694 million for all of the General Governments operations. He said there is a portion within General Government that supports some Basic Utility Services, and is $1.567 million. He said total General Government would be $5.262 million overall. He said the most notable change in this budget year is in the area of Service Administration under General government. He said this has to do with the capital projects.
Ms. Shaffer asked if Income Tax Administration includes the cost of R.I.T.A., and Mr. Coffee said it is included, and is the single largest component.
Chair Wilson moved to Public Safety at this time. Mr. Coffee said the total recommended for this category is $11,178,713. He said the largest item is the Wireless 911, and Mr. Ruller said part of this is a pass through for Kent State University. William Lillich, Safety Director, explained that because of some statutory change, the number of public safety answering points had to reduce from six to five in the County. He said after a few meetings with the 9-1-1 Committee in the County, which the Manager serves on, they decided they wanted to retain the number of answering points. He said the only way they could do that would be to have Kent State and the City of Kent joined together, with Kent assuming the responsibility for the whole jurisdiction. He said based on the allocation, they would pass through the monies to Kent State. He said the monies are generated from fees charged by cell phone companies. He said the income is an estimate of revenues they will receive from the County for the State, with one-third of that allocated to the University.
Chair Wilson said they would now discuss the Transportation section. Mr. Coffee said the recommended budget was $8,268, 067. He said the Basic Utility portion for an additional $1.713 million. He said the grand total is $9.973 million for all transportation expenses. He said the primary change to be noted is under Transportation -Capital Projects, which was detailed in the Capital Plan previously.
Mr. Kuhar asked if the multi-modal facility is included in the capital projects, and Mr. Coffee said it was not in the Plan. Mr. Ruller said the federal monies do not require a local match. Chair Wilson noted it is PARTA=s building. Mr. Ruller agreed, adding they applied jointly. He said that some of that will be built into the City=s development project because of the parking. He said the beauty of this money, as opposed to AMATS, is that there is no local match. He said they were prepared enough to get this project money, adding their funds were already allocated and spent. He said there is Ano new stuff@ in there. Mr. Kuhar asked if they have any money involved in the multi modal facility that will be replaced with the $20 million, and Mr. Coffee said that is not the case.
Ms. Wallach asked where the Downtown Development is listed, and Mr. Coffee said it is in the Community and Environment Section.
Chair Wilson said the next section to be discussed was the Basic Utility Services. Mr. Coffee said that Water had a total of $2.882,573. He said the primary change had to do with capital facilities at the Water Reclamation plant for $1.852 million. He said Solid Waste was $438,250, with Storm Water Drainage at $3.103 million. He said that Storm Water Drainage Capital Facilities was $3.065 million. Mr. Coffee said the total was $8.275 million.
Mr. Kuhar said they had ARefunds@ listed in all of the categories with a zero, and asked Mr. Coffee to explain it. Mr. Coffee said this is another accounting change they instituted. He said they are actually adjusting both sides of the balance sheet, and changed revenue and expenses by an equal amount to reflect the net revenues as opposed to the gross revenue with a refund allocation as an expense. He said this temporarily skews some of the year-to-year comparisons, but in the long run, it is a much clearer picture as to their true revenues. He said it has operational benefits, as they are not just making bookkeeping entries daily. He said they believe it is a more accurate reflection of their income.
Mr. Kuhar asked where the differences are shown between the net and the gross, and Mr. Coffee said they are seeing net revenue projections forecast. Mr. Kuhar said they were showing the gross, sublining the refunds, and Mr. Coffee agreed. He said it is a different accounting methodology. He said they show the revenues higher than what they are. Mr. Kuhar asked where they are showing them recorded now, and Mr. Coffee said those are now offset against their revenue.
Ms. Shaffer said this is where their revenues do not match their expenses, with their capital expenses. She said she needs to go back at the Capital Plan again to understand it better. She asked if they put aside some funds for these projects and are now spending them, by putting them in this budget, and Mr. Coffee said they operate on a fund level in governmental accounting. He said it depends on the fund where those projects were budgeted. He said if they had a capital project budgeted for the Water Fund, and did not expend or encumber those funds in that fiscal year, it would keep the fund balance at a higher level. He said in other words, they are carrying over a fund balance, and inflates the fund balance going into the next fiscal year.
Ms. Shaffer said that some of the projects were not monies they had planned for three or four years earlier, but are now having to do them. She said the Storm Water Fund seems to be the largest combination of funds. She asked what revenues they already had and what do they need to cover, and Ms. Wallach said they carried over $1.71 million in capital monies. Mr. Coffee agreed, adding it was a carryover for all of the prior years.
Ms. Wallach asked if the carried over monies were in the Managed Reserve Fund, and Mr. Coffee said they were not in that fund. Ms. Wallach asked which fund the money would be in, and Mr. Coffee said it depends on which fund each occurred. Ms. Wallach asked where that money is at this time if they did not spend it, and asked if it is in the revenue stream, and Mr. Coffee said it is in each fund balance. He said page 5-8 has an actual breakdown of the fund balances. Ms. Wallach asked if this is included in the projected revenue stream, and Mr. Coffee said revenue projections are completely separate from balances. He said revenue is new income for the City for the new fiscal year. He said the fund balance is similar to their individual checking account balances.
Mr. Wilson noted that Ms. Wallach mentioned the Managed Reserve Fund. He said those funds are completely separate from the fund balance, and Mr. Coffee agreed. He said he wanted to be sure they make the distinction that this does not include the Managed Reserve Fund.
Mr. Coffee said, for an example, Fund 2001 has been carrying $300,000 more since 2006 because the funds for the High Water Area were not encumbered or expended. Mr. Ruller said that Mr. Coffee mentioned earlier about things he would like to improve upon, and this is one of those areas. He said some of the issues will always happen because of the 25% Charter test dedicated for capital. He said they talked about different record keeping and information presentation purposes so as to unbundle it so it is a little clearer. He said it can be fairly complicated. He said they have a format in the Capital Plan that talks about fund balances. He said they used about $860,000 of their fund balance, dropping it down to $11 million. He said the spreadsheet includes a percentage of the funds, but is not every fund. He said when Mr. Coffee brought his first draft of the budget, he showed a fund balance of $21 million. He said as they discussed things further, Mr. Coffee told him it was every fund. He said Mr. Coffee then told him they had $6 million. He said all joking aside, they sorted through it. He said for in the long-term, they should either unbundle them all or they may wish to aggregate some. Mr. Ruller said it is blurry for his preferences. He said Mr. Coffee has the data, but it is a problem with how it is being reported. He said some of their questions reflect that very issue, such as the real balance versus the carryover balance. He said they have talked about setting up a separate fund to hit the 25% Charter requirement, so it is not so blended. He said the way it is now, they have a better flexibility during the course of the budget year. He said for now, that flexibility makes it a little harder to forecast and predict. He said those are higher priorities, so they are moving to a little more certainty.
Mr. Coffee said it has been a settling period for him on the nomenclature and definitions. He said that the words Afund balance@ means one thing for people who have been involved in the process, and has meant something different to him. He said the appropriation ordinance lists all of the various funds, which is more than the six individual funds that comprise the Afund balance@ they are used to reviewing.
Ms. Shaffer said it seems like they are going over the Charter requirement (of 25%), and are borrowing $1.7 million from the future to pay for the capital project now. She asked if they had grant monies that are not included at this time, adding she is trying to understand why they are over the cap.
Jim Bowling, City Engineer, explained that the actual revenue from the grants is shown on Page 1-1. He said she asked what was unexpected in the Storm Water Fund, adding it was the Plum Creek Restoration. He said they received revenue of $1.4 million, with expenses anticipated at $1.55 million, for a net cost of about $150,000. He said in every project they are expecting a revenue, they show the total costs of the project in expenses and include the total revenues in the income. He said with the Plum Creek project, the EPA will pay the contractor directly, adding it is a budgeting technique to show how it was built on the City=s behalf.
Ms. Wallach asked if the $1.7 million that was carried over was money they actually had, waiting to be spent, and Mr. Coffee said that was correct. He said it is in various fund balances. Ms. Wallach asked if the $1.7 million is included in the $45 million budget, and Mr. Coffee said that is an expense forecast. He said that means the expenditure of those reappropriations will draw down the fund balance. Ms. Wallach said then their real expenditures would be $43 million, excluding the $1.7 million in carryover funds, and Mr. Coffee said they are still saying they will expend $45 million. He said the full impact of the $45 million is not all attributable to FY2010. Ms. Wallach said they already have $1.7 million of those expenses, and Mr. Coffee said that means some of the previous years= fund balances were higher than anticipated.
Chair Wilson said they would discuss the Health Services section.
Mr. Coffee said the recommended for 2010 is $510,637. He said there is a portion attributed to Basic Utility Services, known as lab services, for $406,665, representing a total budget of $917,302.
Mr. Kuhar said his comment is not about Health Services. He said, in general, what might be confusing some of them is that they are looking at a budget that is not a reality, but an estimation of reality. He said they cannot compare that to actual things happening now, or monies they currently have. Mr. Coffee agreed that a budget is an estimate. Mr. Kuhar said it seems they are trying to balance reality with estimation, which will not happen until the end of the year. Mr. Coffee said that is one thing he, his staff, and the rest of the Administration does throughout the year, adding they monitor their budget performance. He said that is why they track accounts payable. He said they monitor their estimates and try to decide if they are on track, off track, and what does it mean.
Chair Wilson said they would discuss the Leisure Time Activities. Mr. Coffee said this is Parks and Recreation. Mr. Coffee said they have a total of $2,331.652. He said $2.058 million are for capital projects for the fiscal year.
Chair Wilson said the next section is the Community & Environment section. Mr. Coffee said this is a host of various functions, adding they have a subtotal of $2,178,076. He said a portion of their function is attributable to Utility Services in the amount of $83,386, for a total budget of $2,261,462. He said that within this Section, they have two new funds, which are the Neighborhood Stabilization Fund and the EPA Brownfield Assessment Fund.
Ms. Wallach said the downtown development is closer and closer, and she just found out today that Fairmount is considering breaking ground in October. She said the City will have to come up with some financial piece, and asked if it was included in the budget, and Mr. Ruller said it was not included. Mr. Ruller said the development proposal will include those costs, but some of the smaller items will be paid with the Urban Renewal line. He said they used this line item previously for planning, design, and demo work. He said they will be returning to Council with a development proposal showing any additional costs. He said that site preparation will include the demolition of buildings, utility relocations, and getting something site ready. He said that is likely to be the City=s offering to the development. Mr. Ruller said they have to propose how to finance it, and said they need to see how much can be built in the TIF financing package. He said their goal is to have the majority, if not all costs, recovered through the TIF. He said this may mean some front-loading of those costs so they can reimburse themselves. He said he is guessing that is the structure they are looking at. He said there are no costs for Fairmount or the hotel in the budget, as they are still under negotiation.
Mr. DeLeone said he thought he heard the grant they received for the multi modal facility was to help with the infrastructure, adding it will help immensely. Mr. Ruller said that is one of the most exciting things provided by the grant. He said they will sit down now and decide what is eligible. Mr. Bowling said they will work with the FTA, and need to find out what is eligible.
Mr. Kuhar said they have $225,000 listed for Land Banking. He said he was not aware of anything they plan to do, and Mr. Ruller said that is the West River payback line. Mr. Kuhar asked if there is no subjective land banking included for 2010, and Gary Locke, Dir. of Community Development, explained it is the existing debt on properties acquired in the West River neighborhood. He said they do not know what new debt will be included on anything they may acquire. Mr. Ruller said they have eighteen months left, so this will go away in 2011.
Mr. Kuhar asked if they have projections to purchase property whether they were included in the budget, and Mr. Wilson said they have not approved them yet. Mr. Ruller agreed, adding they must decide on them individually.
Mr. Coffee moved onto the Debt Service and Contingency section. He said their debt continues to decline, adding that Kent has a very low debt level. He said they will continue to pay it down over the course of this year. He said they are fortunate with their note renewal that the bond market remains very favorable from their perspective. He said the rates are at historical lows, and he does not foresee that changing dramatically during their next renewal period. Mr. Coffee said this reflects Kent=s long standing performance of APay as you Go,@ which is to their benefit on the federal level and other levels. Mr. Coffee said their low debt is a positive reflection on Kent=s adoption over the years for Apay as you go.@
Mr. Coffee said the Appendices include a recapitulation of capital appropriations based on a fund breakout. He said it is essentially, a test of the Charter requirement, based on income tax projections. He said they meet the charter test for the capital budget, and there is recommended capital in excess of the Charter Test of $1.356 million. He said there is one error where they reference the Fairchild Bridge. He said that is an error that did not get deleted and is neither applicable nor relevant to this fiscal year.
Ms. Shaffer asked if it is a fair statement to say that their costs exceed their revenues due to necessary capital expenditures, and Mr. Coffee said that is a very fair statement. He said it reverts back to collective commitments made for a multitude of projects.
Mr. Ruller said they have leveraged a ratio of 6:1 or 7:1. He said that while they have put in some of their cash, the return is large. He said they seem to go in cycles for spending capital. He said this year seems to be a little high, while other years have been tight when meeting the Charter test.
Ms. Shaffer asked if they could make a simplified statement as to what those capital expenses are that are so necessary that they have committed to, and Mr. Coffee said they are infrastructure related, timely replacement, repair and improvement. Mr. Bowling said he can speak for a good portion of the capital projects. He said their water system and sanitary sewer system is in a dire need for replacement. He said it has been a long time since they replaced a water line because of old age. He said they also have concern about the condition of the streets, and they looked into that to see what is needed for investments to bring the streets up to community acceptance. Mr. Bowling said they have some frustration that not everything works as expected. He said things shift eventually, and some items may be pushed back. He said there is some flexibility built into the process. Mr. Bowling said that all items in the Capital Plan are in the capital budget. He said that some additional items were brought separately, based on their own merit, such as the energy improvements. He said while they may be a capital expense now, but they will be a savings later.
Ms. Shaffer asked Mr. Bowling if he foresaw any grants in the pipeline that can offset some of the capital expenses so they do not spend as much of their own resources, and Mr. Bowling said they are always looking toward that end. He said they look for funding on a regular basis. He said there is always the potential of some funding sources, similar to the EPA giving them additional monies for the Plum Creek Restoration Project.
Ms. Wallach said the proposed budget minus the carryover in the Capital Plan shows a 12% increase over the projected revenues. She said this means they are going to have about a $5 million excess that is not accountable. She asked if they are just going to take it out of the Managed Reserve Fund, and Mr. Coffee said the plan is to not take any of this from the Managed Reserve Fund. He said they will reduce various fund balances, so those will be lower, based on where the expenses occur. Ms. Wallach asked if they had enough to cover this, and Mr. Coffee said if everything were expended including the Capital Plan, they still believe their fund balances would be healthy and viable. He said they cannot sustain that year after year, but there should be recognition of the water and sewer rate increases were needed. He said it is a difficult decision for Council, but was a necessary change to preserve the fund balances. He said that Engineering staff needs to be permitted to make the necessary investments so water and sewer services continue at the expected level.
Ms. Wallach asked if he gave them the fund balances in the budget, and Mr. Coffee said he did not believe so. Mr. Ruller said it returns to the questions about whether they look at all funds or just certain funds. Ms. Wallach said she heard them say they would pay the $5 million through fund balances, so she would like to know each fund balance. Mr. Coffee said when revenues do not cover expenses, it will drive the fund balance down. Ms. Wallach asked if they could get a copy of the various funds with the balances, and Mr. Coffee said he can give them projected fund balances based on this ballot.
Mr. Ruller said they have been off by about $2 million. He said each year they have projected a certain number in the process. He said they anticipated being in the hole for 2009 by $2 million, but ended up at $866,000. He said they can do what Ms. Wallach wanted, but he would not invest too heavily. He said there is so much that goes into a given year, adding they have to budget.
Ms. Wallach said they would have gone $2 million in debt, without the carryover in capital funds. Mr. Ruller said that trend is continuing every year for the last five years. He used the Crain Avenue Bridge as an example, adding they got a Awhole bunch more money@ that was unexpected. He suggested that could happen with something next year. Ms.Wallach said items are costing more because they have been delayed so long. Mr. Ruller disagreed. He said it could cost more. Mr. Ruller said they are happy to report the balances. He said they saw consistent projections of -$2 million, but ended up with
-$866,000 this year and the previous year to the positive. He said there is no question that Mr. Bowling has his engineering group organized with projects in the pipeline, so they are watching closely. He said the announcement about $20 million will have some cascading impacts on what has been the cost surrounding that project.
Mr. Coffee said in the Capital Plan, the projected fund balance as of Jan. 1, 2010 was $10,404, but they actually ended up with $11,803. He said they had more than $1.4 million than what was originally presented. Mr. Coffee said that same document projects the fund balance at the end of December, 2010 being $7.845 million. He said his current project has that at approximately $8.7 million, using the benchmark fund balance definition. He said they are better off than originally presented, projected, and approved last fall.
Ms. Wallach said she is hearing him say that the $5 million that is over the budget will be paid with City funds. She asked what the plan is for 2011, and questioned whether they would continue to do that, and Mr. Coffee said a lot is going to happen. He said they will know more about the direction of the economy. Mr. Coffee said Mr. Ruller mentioned earlier about how they go through cycles. He said this year is a big capital spend year. He said that is what they are facing currently, adding they all have trepidation and know they cannot sustain it for too many years. He said that some local governments have to fund airports or major road programs. He said they have a long project life cycle, and need to commit funds to those projects with design work, acquisition, and a multitude of steps that will potentially delay the expenditure of those funds until some future fiscal year. He said those are the types of things they experience in a Abig spend year,@ and that is what they will deal within this fiscal year.
Mr. Coffee said the last page has the Managed Reserve Fund information. He said they do not plan to tap it, adding it is there for a reason. Mr. Wilson said it cannot be tapped without the approval of Council. Mayor Fiala said that is how it was originally set up. Mr. Wilson agreed.
Ms. Wallach said she felt she was confusing the $11 million, adding it is not the Managed Reserve Fund, and Mr. Coffee said that was correct. Ms. Wallach asked what comprised the $11 million, and Mr. Wilson said it was carryover monies, and Ms. Wallach said it is undesignated funds. Mr. Coffee agreed. Ms. Wallach said they would be tapping into the undesignated funds, and Mr. Coffee said he must figure out a way to clarify the definitions. He said when he refers to fund balances, it is a total of six funds that have been aggregated as a reference point over the years. Ms. Wallach said she realized that she was calling the undesignated funds the Managed Reserve Fund. She said they have about $11 million in undesignated monies, and will be spending $5 million. She said they do not want to go below $4 million, adding that is when things get scary. Mr. Coffee said they do not want to go that low. He said they have a cushion to make the time and future decisions, to either preserve or extend it, if Council so chooses.
There was no audience comment at this time.
MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE BUDGET WITH THE EMERGENCY CLAUSE.
Motion made by Mr. Ferrara, seconded by Mr. Valenta.
Ms. Wallach asked if this motion was for suspension, and Mr. Wilson said this was to authorize it for discussion in the Council meeting.
Mr. Kuhar said he will vote against the budget for various reasons. He said City government is too top heavy. He said they have a $45 million budget, but by the end of the year, they will probably spend $55 to $60 million with projects not in the budget. He said the money has to come from somewhere, adding he is not sure they can come up with it.
Ms. Wallach said she is going to vote against the budget also. She said it is a 12% increase over 2009, with $5 million unaccounted for, with next year=s budget being higher. She said she did not think the downtown development would show revenues for two or three years. Ms. Wallach said it is a very dangerous position.
The motion carried by a voice vote of 5-2-1, with Mr. Kuhar and Ms. Wallach dissenting. Mr. Wilson abstained.
Mr. Wilson said he assumed this did not include the emergency clause, and the Clerk said they are in Committee and only need five to authorize it. Mr. Wilson said he was unsure if the vote included the emergency clause or if it came off, and the Clerk said it was authorized by a majority vote. She said when they return to the Council meeting, they need seven votes to suspend the three readings and seven for the emergency clause.
Hearing no further business before this Committee, Chair Wilson adjourned this meeting at 9:15 p.m.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
1. TO AUTHORIZE THE 2010 BUDGET
DRAFT NO. 10-25
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING A DONATION RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF KENT PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $485.15 FROM THE FUNDRAISERS HELD FOR THE KENT SKATE PARK, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent Parks & Recreation Department has received a donation in the amount of $485.15 from the fundraisers held for the Kent Skate Park; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to accept said donation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Kent, Portage County, Ohio, at least three-fourths (7) of all members elected thereto concurring:
SECTION 1. That Council does hereby authorize the City Manager on behalf of the City of Kent to accept the donation in the amount of $485.15 from the fundraisers held for the Kent Skate Park.
SECTION 2. That it is found and determined that all formal actions of this Council concerning and relating to the adoption of this Ordinance were adopted in an open meeting of this Council and that all deliberations of this Council, and of any of its committees that resulted in such formal action, were in meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements of Section 121.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.
SECTION 3. That this Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the residents of this City, for which reason and other reasons manifest to this Council this Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure and shall take effect and be in force immediately after passage.
PASSED:____________________________ ___________________________________
DATE MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL
ATTEST:_____________________________
CLERK OF COUNCIL
I hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2010-_____ was duly enacted this__________day of
_________________________, 2010, by the Council of the City of Kent, Ohio
_____________________________________
CLERK OF COUNCIL
DRAFT NO. 10-26
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PURCHASE BY THE KENT DOWNTOWN URBAN REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (DKC) OF APPROXIMATELY .3003 ACRES OF PROPERTY (3 PARCELS) LOCATED AT 241 SOUTH WATER STREET AND THE VACANT LOT BEHIND IT, IN THE CITY OF KENT PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 3.2 AND 3.3 OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OPERATING AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 17, 2009, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, DKC desires to purchase approximately .3003 acres of property located at 241 South Water Street and the vacant lot behind it, in the City of Kent, currently owned by TransOhio Properties, Inc. and James W. and Nancy L. Arthur, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the City's Development Program Operating Agreement, DKC wishes to use loan proceeds authorized by the Development Program but not require or involved the exercise of powers under Chapter 1728; and
WHEREAS, DKC has formally applied to the City for approval of the use of $369,133.25 in loan proceeds for the purchase of the subject real estate; and
WHEREAS, DKC has submitted to City Council the information required by the City's Development Program Operating Agreement concerning the proposed purchase of the subject real estate, including the following information: (all of which information is hereinafter collectively referred to as the 241 South Water Street and the vacant lot behind it Purchase Package):
a) A copy of the proposed Purchase Agreement or Option to Purchase Agreement containing all the parties names and addresses and all material terms of the proposed purchase.
b) A written plan concerning the anticipated immediate use of the property, including leasing possible the property, and any repairs, renovation or demolition of any improvements thereon.
c) A written projection of the costs and expenses associated with the acquisition, ownership and operation of the property and source of funds to defray such costs.
d) Copies of any proposed contracts, bids, leases or other agreements relating to the acquisition ownership or operation of the property by DKC.
e) A written statement setting forth the reason for the acquisition of the property and the anticipated long term use of the property showing such use to be consistent with the City's plan for redevelopment and the job creation or preservation contemplated thereby; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Committee of Council has considered the application of DKC and reviewed the 241 South Water Street and vacant lot Purchase Package at a Finance Committee meeting of Council and has recommended that Kent City Council enact legislation approving the DKC request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Kent, Portage County, Ohio, at least two-thirds (2/3) of all members elected thereto concurring:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of the City's Development Program Operating Agreement, Council does hereby approve the purchase by DKC of three (3) parcels of property, of approximately .3003 acres of property located at 241 South Water Street and the vacant lot, in the City of Kent, in accordance with the 241 South Water Street and vacant lot Purchase Package.
SECTION 2. That Council does hereby direct the Clerk of Council to place on file a complete copy of the 241 South Water Street and vacant lot Purchase Package.
SECTION 3. That Council further authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, and David Coffee, the Director of Budget & Finance, to execute necessary documents and take other necessary action in order to effectuate the use of the loan proceeds for the subject real estate acquisition by DKC in an amount not to exceed $369,133.25.
SECTION 4. That it is found and determined that all formal actions of this Council concerning and relating to the adoption of this Ordinance were adopted in an open meeting of this Council and that all deliberations of this Council, and of any of its committees that resulted in such formal action, were in meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements of Section 121.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.
SECTION 5. That this ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the residents of this City, for which reason and other reasons manifest to this Council this ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure and shall take effect and be in force immediately after passage.
PASSED:
DATE MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL
ATTEST:
CLERK OF COUNCIL
I hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2010-_____ was duly enacted this__________day of
_________________________, 2010, by the Council of the City of Kent, Ohio.
CLERK OF COUNCIL
DRAFT 10-28
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO APPLY FOR A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 1,250,0000 OR HIGHER FROM THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent wishes to apply for a Community Trade Adjustment Assistance Grant from the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration in the amount of $1,250,000 or higher; and
WHEREAS, the application must be filed by April 20, 2010; and
WHEREAS, time is of the essence.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Kent, Portage County, Ohio, at least three-fourths (3/4) of all members elected thereto concurring:
SECTION 1. That Council does hereby authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for a grant from the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration in the amount of $1,250,000 or higher .
SECTION 2. That it is found and determined that all formal actions of this Council concerning and relating to the adoption of this Ordinance were adopted in an open meeting of this Council and that all deliberations of this Council, and of any of its committees that resulted in such formal action, were in meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements of Section 121.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.
SECTION 3. That this Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the residents of this City, for which reason and other reasons manifest to this Council, this Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure and shall take effect and be in force immediately after passage.
PASSED:
DATE MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL
ATTEST:
CLERK OF COUNCIL
I hereby certify that Ordinance No. 2010- was duly enacted on this day of
, 2010 by the Council of the City of Kent, Ohio.
Clerk of Council
THE CITY OF KENT, OHIO
HEALTH & SAFETY COMMITTEE
WED., MARCH 3, 2010
This meeting of the Health & Safety Committee of Kent City Council was called to order by Jack Amhrein, Vice Chair, in the absence of John Kuhar Chair, at 8:15 p.m. on Wed., March 3, 2010. He explained the only item on the agenda dealt with the Regional Fire Study.
PRESENT: MR. AMRHEIN, MR. DELEONE, MR. FERRARA, MS. SHAFFER, MR. VALENTA, MS. WALLACH, AND MR. WILSON
ALSO PRESENT: J. FIALA, MAYOR; D. RULLER, CITY MANAGER; J. SILVER, LAW DIRECTOR; L. COPLEY, CLERK OF COUNCIL; W. LILLICH, SAFETY DIRECTOR; AND J. WILLIAMS, FIRE CHIEF.
ABSENT: MR. TURNER & MR. KUHAR
Dave Ruller, City Manager, explained that William Lillich, Safety Director, and Jim Williams, Fire Chief, were present to update them on this issue. He reminded them they completed Phase 1 of the study, and moved into Phase 2. He said Chief Williams has told him there has been a fair amount of activity among the chiefs, and Chief Williams wanted to update everyone at this time.
Chief Williams said he wanted to bring everyone up to speed. He said they have slowed down somewhat in the last month, but have been busy gathering data for Phase II.
He said in Phase I, they reviewed many items. He said they surveyed Fire and EMS services, and wanted to look at mutual aid and auto aid programs. He said they wanted to evaluate the various stations to evaluate their conditions. He said they looked at communications and dispatch operations. Chief Williams said they reviewed the station location study, to see if they meet current standards.
Chief Williams said they looked at staffing, recruitment, and personnel practices. He said they surveyed management, administration, and command components. He said they reviewed the planning for Fire and EMS protection, and analyzed emergency disaster plants. He said they surveyed the community demographics, and evaluated the finance and income levels. He said all of these components have an impact.
Chief Williams said they ended up with 160 recommendations, and are looking more in-depth at levels of staffing and response time. He said they are reviewing how each department operates, their communication and administration. Chief Williams said they are starting to look at how to blend the services, for more efficient delivery of services.
Chief Williams explained he is the chair of the Chief=s Committee, and distributed his report to the PAFERS Steering Committee. He said he would not read the entire list, but wanted them to see some of the things they are doing. He said the other packet he distributed contains the recommendations. He said the recommendations highlighted in gray are the ones assigned to a subcommittee. He said the blue highlighted recommendations are currently being done or going to be made at the next steering committee. He said the highlighted yellow items are the ones the chiefs feel they can handle without a subcommittee.
Chief Williams said they are working on thirty-three recommendations at this time. He said they decided to look at firefighter safety. He said they wanted to take those recommendations that would improve the firefighters= safety so they could get more of a buy-in from the firefighters. He said the recommendations dealing with the Insurance Services Offices (ISO) would benefit the community. Chief Williams said if they lower the ISO ratings, then insurance rates will be lower.
Ms. Wallach asked if the recommendations that were not highlighted (the white ones) would eventually be assigned to a subcommittee, and Chief Williams said would be, but they have a lot of work to do and are short-staffed. He said it would be nice to dedicate all of their time to the project, but that cannot be done. Chief Williams said that the subcommittees are set up with representatives from each department. He said they take information back to the various departments, reviewing it with the shifts and other personnel. He said they get all of the opinions and return to the Chiefs Committee Steering Committee.
Chief Williams said that working on thirty-three recommendations is quite hectic. He said they have developed a website where they can view all of the meeting minutes from all of the subcommittees, etc. He said it was developed to keep everyone informed.
Chief Williams said he wanted to review some of the things they are working on, such as how they should staff and how many personnel they should send. He said they are classifying buildings, and working with Kent State to host a website, so that all communities can share the information. Chief Williams said that pre plans help with fires, adding they are aware of what chemicals are onsite, the building layout electrical and gas shutoffs. He said they are moving forward with how they respond to calls, and did some other safety things, making it easier for the firefighters to operate.
Chief Williams called for questions on Phase 1 at this time.
Ms. Shaffer said this is a lot of information to digest, adding she is having some difficulty sorting out the main criteria. She said she has heard them speak of safety, but asked about cost savings, and Chief Williams said they have not gotten to that part yet, adding he would get to those recommendations.
He said they have spoken about combining their communication centers, adding he is unsure of the cost savings as it is a very complicated issue. He said they will look at how they purchase equipment, and possible cost savings. He said the hospitals provide supplies to the various EMS units, but because of the economics, the list has changed and they are responsible for another thirty-six items. He said they will review group purchasing. Chief Williams said all of that is in the recommendations, but they cannot deal with all of them at one time.
Ms. Shaffer questioned the issue of safety and delivery of services, and Chief Williams said an example is how many people should respond to the scene of a fire. He said a residential fire is different from Kentway. He said for a residential, they may send twelve to fifteen firefighters, but for a high rise, they may send twenty-five to thirty-six. He said they do not have that many, and the question is how they do it. He said they now use Mutual Aid, which means they wait until they get on the scene. He said they are looking at changing that to be automatic aid, where a staff would automatically be on the way. He said they can be turned around if not needed.
Mr. Lillich said this is meant to clarify and refine the large book they received. He said it will take years to fully implement. He noted he needs to get one to the Mayor. Mr. Lillich said it is important to all members of the Steering Committee to be sure the elected officials are up-to-date with the activities, which is the reason for this presentation. He said they can visit the website, and update themselves. He said they will return periodically with updates, and may discuss funding also.
Ms. Shaffer said they initially paid a fee for this study. She asked if they are still paying that fee or is that portion done, and Mr. Lillich said they paid up-front monies for Phase I, the large report. He said in November they approved an additional $19,000 for Phase 2 of the study, which is the analysis and collection of information. He said in this phase, they will see more concentration on the blending of services, where they will consider erasing the jurisdictional lines, in terms of fire services response. He said they are still seeing how all of the pieces will fit, but noted that one way or another, it will improve services. Mr. Lillich said it may not save money, but may reduce the amount of expense in terms of increase, while they increase their efficiency of services.
Chief Williams said the costs are going up dramatically. He said their last engine purchased in 2004 cost $389,000, and today it would cost $585,000. He said their costs have gone up dramatically. Chief Williams agreed with Mr. Lillich that while they may not reduce their overall cost, they hope to limit those increases. He said it is a lot of work, but very exciting. He said the level of participation of the firefighters, and their comments on how to deliver the services is exciting to them.
Chief Williams moved onto a review of Phase II at this time. He said this includes a further in-depth study on the fire department=s organizational review. He said it includes the development of a loss potential survey, where they look at all structures and facilities in community and determine what happens if they burn down or have a major chemical spill. Chief Williams said that study shows that for 85% of the businesses, if a building burns down, the companies do not rebuild in that community. He said they are looking at what they can do to prevent that from happening.
Chief Williams said they are surveying their apparatus, equipment replacement, and maintenance programs. He said Kent has a fire truck replacement fund, and do the maintenance to extend their life. He said they are trying to get the other departments to the same level to help extend the life. He said they will review the potential of shared vehicles. He said the City is required to have a reserve engine, and the question is how can they share that so they do not have to spend the money.
Chief Williams said they are reviewing their fire prevention and public education programs. He said they need to take advantage of Kent State and improve their education. He said they are reviewing their training programs, and are working together to provide better training. He said they are reviewing how they contract for different services. He said that four communities contract out their ambulance billing, and are all paying a different rate. He said they are studying the blending of services, which means doing away with the boundaries. He said they may see a Streetsboro unit responding to Kent, or Ravenna or Brimfield responding. He said they are providing a capital improvement plan, so that the apparatus at the various stations is cared for. He said the question is how to do it and how to pay for it. He said they are developing an implementation strategy for those recommendations.
Ms. Wallach said it seems like most of the points covered deal with fires, fire prevention, and fire calls. She asked if a majority of their calls are paramedic calls, and Chief Williams said that is part of this, adding it is all inclusive.
There were no further questions, nor audience comment at this time.
Ms. Wallach asked the cost of an EMS truck, and Chief Williams said the last one was purchased in 2008 and cost $189,000. He clarified that is for the vehicle only, with no equipment.
Hearing no further business before this Committee, Vice Chair Amrhein adjourned this meeting at 8:35 p.m.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
1) UPDATE OF REGIONAL FIRE STUDY PRESENTED; NO ACTION NEEDED.
THE CITY OF KENT, OHIO
STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND UTILITIES COMMITTEE
WED., MARCH 3, 2010
This meeting of the Streets, Sidewalks, and Utilities Committee of Kent City Council was called to order by Michael DeLeone, Chair, at 7:00 p.m. on Wed., March 3, 2010.
PRESENT: MR. AMRHEIN, MR. DELEONE, MR. FERRARA, MS. SHAFFER, MR. VALENTA, MS. WALLACH, AND MR. WILSON
ALSO PRESENT: J. FIALA, MAYOR; D. RULLER, CITY MANAGER; J. SILVER, LAW DIRECTOR; L. COPLEY, CLERK OF COUNCIL; G. ROBERTS, SERVICE DIRECTOR; AND S. HARDESTY, WATER TREATMENT PLANT MANAGER
ABSENT: MR. TURNER & MR. KUHAR
Dave Ruller, City Manager, explained that the first item, Area Q Storm Water Project, has been deferred until a later date. He said the next item were the annual reports from the Water Treatment Plant and the Water Reclamation Plant. He said with the budgetary challenges, and the rate increases, he thought it would be a good night to share this information more publicly. Mr. Ruller said he felt it was a good time for everyone to hear from their plant managers about the financial situations and challenges they are facing.
Steve Hardesty, Manager of Water Treatment Plant: Mr. Hardesty said he would be providing justification and cost support of their budget for the last six years. He displayed their Operations and Maintenance budget for 2007, 2008, and 2009.
Mr. Hardesty said their travel and transportation consists of trips to Columbus, seminars and training. At this time Ms. Wallach asked if he would provide them with a copy of his power point presentation, and he said he would do so.
Mr. Hardesty said in 2008, vehicle fuel reached $4.00 per gallon. He said they projected $16,000, and spent less than half of that money. He said that they used $235,000 in utilities, with $179,000 for electricity. He said this includes the plant, the booster stations, all of the wells and the tanks.
Mr. Hardesty said the communications and postage covered such things as their Consumer Confidence Reports and other mailings.
Mr. Hardesty said the next line deals with Rents and Leases. He said they spent $6500 from the budgeted amount of $7000. He said this is the rental of the track hoe used to clean out the sludge lagoons that they give to farmers, as it is a good fertilizer.
Mr. Hardesty said their professional services budget was $4500 budget and they spent $6500, because of some issues with ice.
Mr. Hardesty said their Maintenance and Repair was budgeted for $27,000, but they spent $32,000. He said this was not an over-expenditure. Mr. Hardesty said they bought a front end loader from their capital monies that included $8000 for a maintenance contract. He said the Budget & Finance Department Aslid it in@ to his Maintenance and Repair line of his budget.
Mr. Hardesty said their insurance and bonding is handled by Budget & Finance, and he has no control over that expenditure.
Mr. Hardesty said that Line 37, Printing and Photocopying, is self-explanatory, and covered the costs of various reports.
Mr. Hardesty said that Line 39, Miscellaneous Contractual Services, included nearly $10,000 on a plant license, payable to the EPA. He said they spent almost $15,000 on water testing by private labs. Mr. Hardesty explained they did a wellhead protection study, and have new wells and tests wells protecting their aquifer. He said the tests are done quarterly by a lab in Columbus. Mr. Hardesty noted it is half the cost of what they paid an Akron lab, and they are better.
Mr. Hardesty said Line 41, office supplies, is self-explanatory, and Line 42 represents their other supplies. He said they budgeted $210,000, and spent $240,000. He said there were astronomical increases in some of their main chemicals. He said that Soda Ash went up $15,000 in 2009, as the price increased from $281 per ton to $359 per ton.
Mr. Hardesty said they budgeted $5800 for small tools and minor repair, adding the $3,000 jump was moved from Line 35, Maintenance and Repair, which decreased by a like amount. He said he has staff that is talented enough to install their own equipment. He said they do most of their own maintenance. He said they are just as good and cheaper, saving a lot of money.
Mr. Hardesty said he did a comparison of their variable costs, as compared to their fixed costs. He said he included their operating and personnel expenses from 2003 through 2009. He said variable costs include items like their utilities and chemicals that do vary. He said fixed items include things like the employees= salaries, Worker=s Compensation, contracts with labs, uniforms, etc. He said the six year average showed that 27% of their costs are variable, while 73% are fixed. He said there is a six-year average of $350,925 in variable costs, with fixed costs averaging $923,208.
He displayed the budgeted and actual amounts spent for their Operations and Maintenance budgets. He said he became the plant manager in 2004, adding they went over their budget by $29,000. He said they experimented in the early 2000s, with the soda ash as it is the most expensive chemical they use. He said they cut back on the dosage and found out it was not doing their distribution system any favors. He said they were over the budgeted amount by $29,000 in 2004, with another $38,000 in 2005. He said that 2006 was relatively calm, and 2007 represented huge price increases in their soda ash, electricity, and gas. He said they were $18,000 over their budget in 2007 and $38,000 in 2008. He said that their 2009 budget showed that they over spent it by $7600, but they also used $32,000 from their contingency funds.
Mr. Hardesty said the cost to treat 1000 gallons of water was 0.49 in 2003, and increased to 0.68 in 2009. He said it does not include their personnel budget. Mr. Hardesty said they treated about 900,000,000 gallons last year, while they treated 1 billion gallons ten years earlier. He said their water usage is down about 10%. Mr. Hardesty said they found a leak of about 600,000 gallons daily near Plum Creek. He said Kent State also tore down some housing, and began using more energy efficient toilets. Mr. Hardesty said the Service Director also pointed out that people did not have to water their lawns last summer because of the regular rain intervals.
Mr. Hardesty showed thirteen years of costs for lime and soda ash. He noted that their lime has almost doubled, and soda ash is $359 per ton today, while it used to be $150.72 per ton in 1997. He said they used $232,000 in chemicals in 1996, and used $210,000 in 2009. He said they are squeezing their nickels to get the biggest bang for their buck.
Mr. Hardesty said their electrical costs for the last six years have increased by about $50,000. He said this includes their plant, wells, a separate meter at the booster station and the old booster/storage tanks. He said from 2005 to 2006, they had a huge jump to $161,000, which was an error. He said they have a demand meter for a better rate, adding Ohio Edison=s meter was charging the maximum billing rate, resulting in an overcharge. He said the next year, they dropped to $135,000 because of a credit from Ohio Edison.
Mr. Hardesty displayed their personnel services cost per 1000 gallons. He said it has gone up an average of 5.1% per year. He said this includes items like salaries, overtime, worker=s comp, insurance, and uniforms. Mr. Ruller asked if this included distribution costs, and Mr. Hardesty said that is not part of his budget.
Mr. Hardesty explained their System Control and Data Acquisition equipment, adding the Service Director can control the water plant from his office. He said this program runs the whole water treatment plant and consists of nine screens. He said they can see how much water is in the tanks, and which pumps are on or off. He said they can start a pump with the click of a mouse, and can control the entire system from this equipment.
Mr. Hardesty said an operator looked at the screen a few months earlier, and noted a seven-foot drop in water at the Fairchild Tank. He said they knew there was a break somewhere, adding that was when the contractor hit a line on SR 43.
Mr. Hardesty said another beauty of the system is its versatility. He said it runs through radio signals, and each radio can handle twenty-seven separate functions. He said the radio at the wells can tell them which pumps are running. He said they have a tool that fits into the well and tells how much water is in the well. He said it can be hooked up to motion detectors. Mr. Hardesty said the radio signals are more reliable and cost effective. He said they were able to terminate with the security company for the well buildings and tank locations, as they are now controlled by sensors in the system.
Mr. Ruller asked when this went online, and Mr. Hardesty said it was a few years before he was hired.
Mr. Hardesty said he had a few examples of the work his staff does. He said they were able to purchase a better piece of equipment, because they did not need $23,000 for installation, as it was done by his staff. He said he is proud of their work.
Mr. Hardesty displayed a photo of their power shaving generator. He said they can run any combination of pumps from 9:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m., without getting penalized. He said that two high pressure pumps cost about $8000 daily, and with the generator, they are able to generate their own power. He said it had a payback of about four years, cost $52,000, and was installed by his personnel.
Mr. Hardesty showed a photo of a high pressure gas pump that was used, previously, as the power shaving generator. He said the old one threw a rod, and they got a bid to replace it for $52,000. He said his employees went online, found it in a warehouse in New Jersey, and traveled to New Jersey to pick it up. He said they paid nothing for installation. Mr. Hardesty said his costs went from $52,000 to $17,000 because the staff was willing and handy.
Mr. Hardesty showed a photo of a large concrete block that held a bearing, which held a drive shaft, to run a pump. He said the concrete barrier vibrated and broke apart. Mr. Hardesty said he asked his new mechanic to weld a unit, lagging it into concrete so it will not vibrate. Mr. Hardesty said his mechanic welded it, put it on there; and made adjustments for the drive shaft. He said it runs smoother than ever.
Mr. Hardesty showed a photo of their sludge lagoons. He said this waste is calcium carbonate sludge, adding that the farmers love it. He said they have two lagoons. He said they previously filled them, and paid a contractor to truck it away. Mr. Hardesty said his predecessor decided to put in sludge presses. He said they dump the sludge into a tri-axle dump and take it to the farmers. He said they only use the lagoons when the presses go down. Mr. Hardesty said they have about four acres of lagoons, and one is 4/5 empty at this time. He said it is not a huge priority, adding he cannot see spending the money to empty the lagoons. He said about once a year, he spends a few weeks on them. He said for those farmers who pick it up, they receive it first as the City does not have to deliver it.
Mr. Hardesty said he is proud of their Wellhead Protection Program. He said in 2008, Kent was one of six communities to devise such a program. He said they took the wellfield delineation, and give it a travel time of one to five years for the contaminants to get to the aquifer. He said after the EPA did the delineation, they went to every place within the delineation to find out what chemicals they use, as well as treatment processes, etc. He said they also have an emergency contingency plan should spills occur. Mr. Hardesty said the plan was approved in 2008 for cost savings of $40,000. He said they also did their own Risk Management Plan, saving about $7,000 by doing it in-house.
Chair DeLeone called for questions at this time.
Ms. Wallach asked Mr. Hardesty to forward the slide presentation, and Mr. Ruller said he would do so after Mr. Hardesty sent it to him.
Ms. Shaffer noted Mr. Hardesty spoke of the decrease in water usage, but an increase in the costs, and Mr. Hardesty agreed, adding it was a great increase. Ms. Shaffer asked how a decease in water contributes to the budget=s bottom line, and Gene Roberts, Service Director, said if they sell less, they bring in less revenues, but their costs are fixed. He said they are seeing 10% less revenue than they received ten years ago, resulting in less to spend. He said they are seeing this decline with their capital money.
Ms. Shaffer asked if there are any plans to sell water, and Mr. Hardesty said that Portage County is taking care of a lot of the surrounding areas, such as Brimfield, Ravenna Township, and Streetsboro. He said their only chance to sell water would be toward Brady Lake. He said they do have a twenty-inch emergency line with Ravenna, adding that any monies would be split between the two cities. He said it holds about 250,000 gallons of water.
Mr. Valenta said from 2003 to 2009, Hudson Lime was the only company they used, and Mr. Hardesty said they bid every year, adding the price has stayed about the same.
Ms. Wallach said she knows the water usage was down, and when it goes down, the chemical usage also reduced, but not proportionately. Mr. Hardesty said the prices went up more than the usage decreased.
Mr. Ferrara asked if they sell the sludge, and Mr. Hardesty said they give it to the farmers. He said there is no charge, even if they deliver it. He said that sooner or later, it has to be valuable, and they will sell it. Mr. Roberts said it is cheaper to give it away than to pay the dumping fee.
Mr. Ruller asked Mr. Hardesty if he is comfortable with their water levels, and Mr. Hardesty said they have a contingency plan, which is a water recharge basin near the wells. He said they can pump from the creek, raising the sand/gravel aquifer.
Mr. Ruller asked Mr. Hardesty if there is anything on the horizon with the EPA that keeps him up at night, and he said if they came under the influence, their regulations and associated costs could go through the roof.
Ms. Wallach asked if there is a reason for the increase in the chemicals, and Mr. Hardesty said they do competitive bidding, adding that they all went up. Mr. Roberts said the chemicals are made in plants that consume gas and/or electric, and the companies are charging the cost back. He said it is like rock salt, adding there is no reason for it to be where it is, and is up in cost because the companies can get that price.
Ms. Wallach noted that the gas prices have not increased much, and asked if they expect them to level off, and Mr. Hardesty said they have come down. Mr. Roberts said he does not see the chemical prices coming down. Mr. Hardesty said that Floyd Brown & Associates is doing a study on efficiencies and things they can improve. He said it relates to the physical plant, demand, motors, and they even go through the chemical process to see if they can use a different chemical. He said it is underway at this time.
Mr. Valenta asked if they would receive a discount if they buy it in larger bulk and store it, and Mr. Hardesty said they would not.
Ms. Shaffer asked if they entered the Best Tasting Water Contest, and Mr. Hardesty said they were entered. He said over the years, they received First Prize, Silver, Bronze, and two Fifth Places, but nothing this year. Ms. Shaffer said if they win, they can do bottled water, and Mr. Hardesty said it would not be a bad idea. He noted they are doing with ten people what fourteen used to do. He said if they want to sell it, they need a bottling crew, shipping crew, and advertising crew.
There were no further questions nor comments at this time.
Mr. Roberts said he would present the report for the Water Reclamation Facility. He said that Bob Brown, plant manager, was unable to be present.
Mr. Roberts explained that no matter what is dumped throughout Kent, it ends up at the reclamation facility. He showed an aerial phonograph from the late 1980s. He pointed out the Cuyahoga River that runs next to the plant. He said the plant=s entire purpose is to protect the Cuyahoga River. He said they take dirty water, clean it, and discharge it.
Mr. Roberts showed the influent and the effluent being discharged in the river. He said most days, the effluent is cleaner than the river water. He displayed a photo of the stabilized bio-solids, which is what is left when they are done.
Mr. Roberts said the staff takes care of the exterior building maintenance, and recently painted it. He said they also remodeled the office and the alarm room, and put an addition to the maintenance bay. He said they bought some used equipment because of an increase in the grease, hauling it to a waste landfill. He said the staff also put a temporary building over the bar screen, designing it to lift it off with a crane.
Mr. Roberts said there have been process upgrades from 2003 to 2009, adding there were two major construction upgrades. He said one was the bar screen. He said they also replaced the lid on Digester #1. Mr. Roberts said they used to have a gate valve, which was a big steering wheel used to lower the gate. He said they have automated dissolved oxygen controls. He said if it is too low, it turns up the pump, lowering the gate. He said if it is too high, it is adjusted. Mr. Roberts said they also put a sun screen shade over the weir system because of the algae bloom. He said this dropped it off almost completely, adding they used to unclog it.
Mr. Roberts said the pipe gallery, blower motor, and all electrical are all done in-house by the Central Maintenance staff. He said Mr. Brown has offered to give them a tour.
Mr. Roberts said the Water Reclamation Manager developed a process for training new operators as well as a reference manual. He said when the original plant was designed in the 1980s, they had large Operations & Maintenance manuals, which did not help the operators. He said Mr. Brown distilled it down, and uses it for training. He said the operators use the reference manuals on a daily basis.
Mr. Roberts said the big graph that rotates on a motor has been replaced, and the SCADA system was installed. He said they are able to gather extremely accurate data that is computerized.
Mr. Roberts said they are treating less water. He said the water goes through distribution from the Water Plan, and is discharged in the sanitary sewer collection system. He said in 2002, they did the I & I study, which is the Inflow and Infiltration study. He said they had ground water leaking into the sanitary sewer, costing the same to treat. He said this has decreased, and they have saved money on the volume treated.
Mr. Roberts displayed fixed costs versus variable costs. He said the average fixed cost was $1.1 million, with the variable cost average for seven years being 22% or $323,220. He said when they decrease the flow at the plant, they only see a 21% savings, as they have no control over their fixed costs. He said both plants have downsized in terms of the number of staff members. He said the last decrease in the Reclamation Facility was in 2006, when they reduced from eleven staff members to ten staff members. He said they run on sixteen hours of manpower, with eight hours manned by a security guard. He said in event there is an alarm or a problem, the security guard calls the chief operator, and this happens once or twice a week. He said Mr. Brown can monitor all of the lift stations from his facility.
Mr. Roberts said from 2003 to 2009, personnel services has seen an increase of $10,437, largely due to the decrease in staff. He said that is about 0.2% annually for labor. He said the cost per 1000 gallons is not equal. He said they are developing a higher strength waste, the increasing the cost to treat it. He said their operation and maintenance actual costs only increased $1519 from 2003 to 2009, representing an increase of 0.04%.
Mr. Roberts said the capital is always changing, with the lowest being in 2007 and $237,000 spent in 2009. He said the average is $124,000 in capital.
Mr. Roberts said they combined the personnel services with the operations & maintenance. He said 23% is flexible and changes with the flow. Mr. Roberts said the budget was $153,000, or an average annual increase of 1.7%. He said they are beating the cost of living in their operations. He said those were budgeted amounts, while the actual amount from 2003 to 2009 was an increase of 0.1% annually.
Mr. Valenta asked what happens to the solid waste, and MR. Roberts said they signed an agreement in 1998 with PPG of Barberton. He said they take it, mix it with lime, and will have a park in Barberton. He said the City pays a small fee to haul it over there, adding it is half of what they would pay in the landfill.
Ms. Wallach asked if it would not be good for the farmers, and Mr. Roberts said there are two classes of sludge from the EPA=s viewpoint. He said they have Class A and Class B, with Class B having no human waste left. Mr. Roberts said they do not take the final step, adding they are at 99%. He said it is cheaper to haul it to Barberton. He said that once they fill up, the City will need to change. He said that Portage County is putting in a kiln, cooking their sludge, and the City could look at partnering with them.
Ms. Shaffer asked the major cost increase, over time, for the plant, and Mr. Roberts said it was the electrical costs and the chemical costs. He said in the late 1980s to the early 1990s, they were spending about $100,000 annually. He said they made some major modifications in the treatment processes, using cheaper chemicals and good quality effluent. Mr. Hardesty noted that the Reclamation Facility is a bio plan, and the Water Plant is a chemical plant. He said the Reclamation Facility=s electric bill is probably twice the cost of his plant.
Hearing no further questions or comments Chair DeLeone adjourned the meeting at 7:54 p.m.
Linda M. Copley, Clerk of Council
ACTION RECOMMENDED:
1. AREA Q STORM WATER PROJECT DISCUSSION WAS DEFERRED
2. REPORTS WERE RECEIVED, FOR 2009, FOR THE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY AND THE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN.
Draft No. 10-27
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR HIS DESIGNEE, TO PARTICIPATE IN THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION’S CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF SODIUM CHLORIDE/ROCK SALT FOR THE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, Section 5513.01 (B) of the Ohio Revised Code provides the opportunity for Counties, Townships, Municipal Corporations, Port Authorities, Regional Transit Authorities, State Colleges/Universities and County Transit Boards to participate in contracts of the Ohio Department of Transportation for the purchase of machinery, material, supplies, or other articles; and
WHEREAS, the City should be able to save money by purchasing the sodium chloride/rock salt with the other government entities at bulk rates; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to participate in this contract for the purchase of sodium chloride/rock salt; and
WHEREAS, time is of the essence.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Kent, Portage County, Ohio, at least seven (7) members elected thereto concurring:
SECTION 1. That Council does hereby authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to participate in the Ohio Department of Transportation’s contract for the purchase of sodium chloride/rock salt for the period of one year, a copy of which is marked Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. That it is found and determined that all formal actions of this Council concerning and relating to the adoption of this Resolution were adopted in an open meeting of this Council and that all deliberations of this Council, and of any of its committees that resulted in such formal action, were in meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements of Section 121.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.
SECTION 3. That this Resolution is hereby declared to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare of the residents of this City, for which reason and other reasons manifest to this Council this Resolution is hereby declared to be an emergency measure and shall take effect and be in force immediately after passage.
PASSED:
DATE MAYOR AND PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL
ATTEST:_____________________________
CLERK OF COUNCIL
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2010- was duly enacted this day of
, 2010, by the Council of the City of Kent, Ohio.
_______________________________
CLERK OF COUNCIL
|
|
Ohio Department of Transportation Central Office, 1980 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43223 Ted Strickland, governor Jolene M. Molitoris, Director |
February 9, 2010
Re: 018-11, Salt-Sodium Chloride
Dear Municipality:
All political subdivisions desiring to participate with the Ohio Department of Transportation in the purchase of sodium chloride (rock salt) for the 2010-2011 winter seasons must complete and submit the enclosed participation agreement to the Office of Contracts. All agreements must be received by our office prior to March 26th, 2010. This will allow our office sufficient time to add your requirements to our bidding documents.
The participation agreement consists of the resolution/ordinance of the legislative authority or governing board of the political subdivision authorizing participation in this contract and agreeing to be bound by the invitation's terms and conditions.
Upon receipt of the agreement each political subdivision will get added to a list that will be maintained on the Office of Contracts web site. This list will be updated daily on the Contracts web site located at ->
http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ContractAdmin/Contracts/Purchase/salt.doc
Email the completed resolution to contracts.purchasing@dot.state.oh.us or fax a copy to 614-887-4022.
If you have any questions please email contracts.purchasing@dot.state.oh.us.
Respectfully,
Tom Pannett
Administrator
Office of Contracts
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of Contracts
Purchasing Services
Cooperative Purchasing Program
Sodium Chloride (Rock Salt)
Contract 018 - http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/ContractAdmin/Contracts/Pages/Purchase.aspx
DATE SUBMITTED:
![]()
RESOLUTION / ORDINANCE as adopted for sodium chloride/ rock salt requirements for purchase. Effective period: twelve months from date of award, inclusive, or on an effective date as determined by the Director at the time of bid.
Whereas, Section 5513.01(B) of the Ohio Revised Code provides the opportunity for Political Subdivisions including Counties, Townships, Municipal Corporations, Port Authorities, Regional Transit Authorities, State Colleges/Universities and County Transit Boards and others to participate in contracts of the Ohio Department of Transportation for the purchase of machinery, material, supplies, or other articles;
Now Therefore, Be it Ordained, Intending to Be Legally Bound That Eugene K. Roberts
(Agent)
Hereby Requests Authority in The Name of City of Kent
(Political Subdivision)
To participate in the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Contract for Rock Salt and Agrees:
1) To purchase an estimated salt tonnage, indicated below, exclusively from the vendor awarded the rock salt contract for the county in which said political subdivision is located;
NOTE: By executing this agreement and providing an estimated tonnage the Political Subdivision recognizes that Contract 18 will contain a min/max tonnage provision, as determined by the Director at the time of bid but will not exceed 80/120 respectively, for which the Political Subdivision will be responsible.
2) To be bound by the terms and conditions of the contract;
3) To be responsible for payment directly to the vendor for the quantities purchased under the contract; and
4) To be responsible for resolving all disputes arising out of participation in the contract and agree to release the Director of Transportation and the Ohio Department of Transportation from liability for all loss or damage, and from any and every claim or damage resulting from or arising out of participation in the contract pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 5513.01(b).
MINIMUM ORDER = 1 TRUCKLOAD / 22 TONS WITHOUT PILER OR 200 TONS WITH PILER
STOCKPILE LOCATIONS STOCKPILE CAPACITY TONS REQUIRED (Estimated)[1]
590 Plum St., Kent, Ohio 5,000 tons 4,500 tons
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Email the completed resolution to contracts.purchasing@dot.state.oh.us or fax a copy to 614-887-4022.
Continued
Participating Political Subdivisions are intended beneficiaries under this contract and are real parties in interest with the capacity to sue and be sued in their own name without joining the state of Ohio, Ohio Department of Transportation. By signing and returning this agreement, you will be bound to participate in this contract during the upcoming winter season, upon award of the contract to a successful vendor. A participating Political Subdivision cannot change its position during this contract period. Termination of participation is effective upon the expiration date of the contract. Failure of a Political Subdivision to purchase its requirements from the awarded vendor or comply with the terms of this contract may invalidate participation for the following winter season.
Political subdivisions will be required to submit a new participation agreement form every year, indicating storage capacity and stating salt needs for the contract period.
![]()
(Authorized Signature and Title)
(Date)
Eugene K. Roberts, Service Director
![]()
(Print
Exactly as Signed Above)
Portage
![]()
(County Location)
City of Kent
![]()
(Political
Subdivision)
930 Overholt Road
![]()
(Street)
(P.O.
Box)
Kent
OH 44240
(City)
(State) (Zip plus 4)
Jack Hogue,
Central Maintenance Manager 330-678-8105
(Contact Name Responsible for Ordering Salt) (Phone Number)
Hogue@Kent-Ohio.org
(E-Mail Address)
Note: This Participation Agreement must be received by the Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Contracts, Purchasing Services prior to the mailing of Invitation 018 each year.
Email the completed resolution to contracts.purchasing@dot.state.oh.us or fax a copy to 614-887-4022.